On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 10:49 AM 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel
wrote:
> Does cysignals get enough support to keep going or do we want to try a
> different approach? This different approach will for sure not be as
> efficient, but will probably need less effort to maintain.
>
sig_on/
Sorry about that. It is pip installable of course. However, it uses some
non standard setup.
I've been too long out of the topic. I just noticed that there is no active
development. This might be fine. But I'm not sure.
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 19:27 Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
> I would suggest loopin
I would suggest looping in the Cython community (cython-users list) on
these questions.
Could you elaborate on "cysignals is not pip-installable"? We are even
building platform wheels - https://pypi.org/project/cysignals/#files
On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 7:49:44 AM UTC-7 jonatha...@googlemail
Hi,
it's been over a year since the last activity on
https://github.com/sagemath/cysignals.
This could well be, because it is a good shape, but looking at the issues,
I'm not too sure about that. Here are some issues, I know of:
- sig_on/sig_off is poorly maintained and not thread safe
- cysig
The codes
x,y = var('x,y');
f(x) = acos(sqrt((1-tan(x)^2)/2));
g(x) = integral(sin(y)^4,(y,f(x),pi-f(x)));
h(x) = sin(x)^2*cos(x)*g(x);
integral(h(x),(x,-pi/4,pi/4)), numerical_integral(h(x),-pi/4,pi/4)
produce
(1/16*sqrt(2)*pi, (0.1963495451106892, 9.705160370278192e-07))
SageMath version: 9.8
