Sure, but these just the first few packages. Better
list: https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/35583
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 5:10:43 PM UTC-7 Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 13:10 -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> >
> > This drops platform support for 32-bit Linux (see
On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 13:10 -0700, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> This drops platform support for 32-bit Linux (see
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Sage-9.8-Release-Tour#availability-of-sage-98-and-installation-help)
>
> for these optional packages. We will need a decision if this OK.
>
G
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 1:45:31 PM UTC-7 TB wrote:
Should `sage -i pandoc`, at least in an interactive session, first
recommend to install it from the distro, and not default to conda?
I missed this detail about "sage -i" in my response above.
This is an interesting idea, but is orthog
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 1:45:31 PM UTC-7 TB wrote:
On 29/04/2023 23:10, Matthias Koeppe wrote:
In this PR (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585), the three
optional packagesinfo, valgrind, rubiks are switched from our custom
installation scripts to a (binary) installation from con
On 29/04/2023 23:10, Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
In this PR (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585),
the three optional packagesinfo, valgrind, rubiks are
switched from our custom installation scripts to a (binary)
installation from conda-f
In this PR (https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585), the three
optional packagesinfo, valgrind, rubiks are switched from our custom
installation scripts to a (binary) installation from conda-forge.
This drops platform support for 32-bit Linux (see
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Sag
That's now https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35585 (needs review);
starting with optional packages, not standard infrastructure packages
though.
On Saturday, April 29, 2023 at 12:14:56 AM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
> +1 to just using conda for all basic infrastructure packages if the host
+1 to just using conda for all basic infrastructure packages if the host
doesn't have them. Just put a conda env in the PATH and done.
In my experience these work really well. I've only gotten issues with conda
when you veer off the trodden path too much, e.g. I've had nothing but
trouble insta
