[sage-devel] Re: The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

Here is the link to the ticket #34730 https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34730 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.c

[sage-devel] Re: The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

By the way, please also review https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34710 to fix the cluttered TOCs. On Wednesday, November 9, 2022 at 2:22:43 PM UTC+9 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Hi, > > Trac #34730 rebases sage_autodoc onto the upgraded Sphinx 5.3.0. It is > responsible for formatting Sage objects (fu

[sage-devel] The documentation built for #34730 needs your attention for checking

Hi, Trac #34730 rebases sage_autodoc onto the upgraded Sphinx 5.3.0. It is responsible for formatting Sage objects (functions, classes, etc.) to build documentation. Please check your favorite sections in our documentation https://aa74d4badcbe6841833ff983ad5f756c5ac78752--sagemath-tobias.netl

[sage-devel] Re: [Bug report] quaternionic polynomial division gives incorrect results

Thanks for reporting the bug. I opened trac ticket #34733 for this. On Tuesday, November 8, 2022 at 3:20:51 AM UTC-7 pkopr...@pkoprowski.eu wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I just discovered a bug in the polynomial division over quaternion > algebras. I don

Re: [sage-devel] "make" command ends in error because of giac

Sorry I forgot to mention, I am trying to build Sage 9.7, but I actually had an older version installed previously, but I deleted the sage-directory. But if you could tell by the log file that I was trying to build an older version of Sage, maybe the issue is that I didn't remove all relevant files

[sage-devel] [Bug report] quaternionic polynomial division gives incorrect results

Hello everyone, I just discovered a bug in the polynomial division over quaternion algebras. I don't see it discussed anywhere on the internet, so I believe this is a proper place to report it. Bug description: the quo_rem method for polynomials with quaternionic coefficients outputs incorrect