William Stein wrote:
> Perhaps this is a bad criteria, e.g.,
> it excludes our webmaster (Harald Schilly), since he's done a lot to
> support Sage, but I don't think he's contributed code to the library
> -- at least I didn't find him in Dima's list from GitHub.
Looks like he has:
~/co/sage:devel
Hi,
We could just declare that "You may vote if you have contributed to
the source code of Sage" and leave it at that. The idea is to give
people a criteria for voting. Perhaps this is a bad criteria, e.g.,
it excludes our webmaster (Harald Schilly), since he's done a lot to
support Sage, but I
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 5:42 PM David Roe wrote:
>
> When I did this a few weeks ago there were only a couple hundred. I think
> it's only showing people who have a github account linked to the email they
> used on the commit (which may be lower than normal, since grad students and
> postdocs
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 10:23:38 AM UTC-7 erik@gmail.com
wrote:
> I'm late to discussion (also sorry for top-posting) but I don't see any
> discussion of a middle ground where rather than "switching" starkly to
> GitHub, just enabling issues and PRs on GitHub and see how it goes.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 6:23 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> I'm late to discussion (also sorry for top-posting) but I don't see any
> discussion of a middle ground where rather than "switching" starkly to
> GitHub, just enabling issues and PRs on GitHub and see how it goes.
One of the main reaso
I'm late to discussion (also sorry for top-posting) but I don't see any
discussion of a middle ground where rather than "switching" starkly to
GitHub, just enabling issues and PRs on GitHub and see how it goes.
We tried the same experiment with GitLab some time ago with synchronizing
to Trac, and
I'd suggest that we merge this info into
https://github.com/sagemath/website/blob/master/conf/contributors.xml,
possibly using a new attribute "altnames"
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 9:49:47 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
>
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage-changelogs/blob/master/merger/
https://github.com/sagemath/sage-changelogs/blob/master/merger/contributors/9.7
also has a good dataset (this is from the script that makes changelogs)
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 9:42:49 AM UTC-7 David Roe wrote:
> When I did this a few weeks ago there were only a couple hundred. I thin
When I did this a few weeks ago there were only a couple hundred. I think
it's only showing people who have a github account linked to the email they
used on the commit (which may be lower than normal, since grad students and
postdocs may have used academic email accounts that are no longer active
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 5:30 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:09 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 AM kcrisman wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>> "Subscribed to sage-devel" might not be a good criteria. For example,
> > >>> Harald Schilly has been the we
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:09 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 AM kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> "Subscribed to sage-devel" might not be a good criteria. For example,
> >>> Harald Schilly has been the webmaster of Sage since 2007 and likely
> >>> cares about this switch si
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 8:09:33 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> (by the way, by looking at this list I found that johanrosenkilde
> works for GitHub now :-))
Surprise! Johan did much work in coding theory in academy and in sage.
--
You received this message because you are subs
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:51 AM kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>>> "Subscribed to sage-devel" might not be a good criteria. For example,
>>> Harald Schilly has been the webmaster of Sage since 2007 and likely
>>> cares about this switch since it can impact him, but I don't think he
>>> reads sage-devel.
>>>
> "Subscribed to sage-devel" might not be a good criteria. For example,
>> Harald Schilly has been the webmaster of Sage since 2007 and likely
>> cares about this switch since it can impact him, but I don't think he
>> reads sage-devel.
>>
>
>>
If we're going to talk about previous practice, I ca
14 matches
Mail list logo
