[sage-devel] No more Cygwin support in Sage 9.7

2022-08-07 Thread Matthias Koeppe
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/34301 (needs review) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discuss

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 12:48:21 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > I would like to see all of them fixed, p_group_cohomology especially, but > I think we are coming up on a release and if the package doesn't build on > supported platforms, we can't really call it optional. Once a package is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022, 20:48 John H Palmieri, wrote: > I would like to see all of them fixed, p_group_cohomology especially, > there is a regression to solve with the package, which needs understanding of the algorithm behind. (build problems are solved, I think). but I think we are coming up

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread John H Palmieri
I would like to see all of them fixed, p_group_cohomology especially, but I think we are coming up on a release and if the package doesn't build on supported platforms, we can't really call it optional. Once a package is fixed, then it should immediately get promoted back to optional again. Reg

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Marc Culler
Incidentally, the patch for p_group_cohomology that I uploaded above also appeared in #30787 . - Marc On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 7:49:41 AM UTC-5 Marc Culler wrote: > The p_group_cohomology package i

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Marc Culler
Yes, there is a ticket for this. It is #34221 . The current version of Cython ignores .pxd files in directories with no __init__.py. The ticket backports a cython fix for that problem which will appear in a future Cython release. - Marc On Saturday,

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread Marc Culler
The p_group_cohomology package is included in the macOS binary release. it requires a patch to its spkg-install,sh. Symengine_py is also included in the macOS binary and also needs a patch. I am attaching a tarball of the build/pkg directories for those two packages. - Marc On Sunday, Augus

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for sphinx background style

2022-08-07 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:57:52 PM UTC+9 Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > I slightly protest that one day of voting at the end of the week is not a > lot of time for such a consequential vote. > I agree. Sorry about that. > That being said, I support grayish (but I also noticed there is so lit

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

2022-08-07 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
I would like to see the p_group_cohomology fixed. Progress got stalled on that, but I am happy to work on that (while I have time for August). Best, Travis On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 5:23:46 AM UTC+9 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > The sage_numerical_backends_* packages are on their way out anyway.

[sage-devel] Re: Group algebra bug

2022-08-07 Thread 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel
I posted on the ticket a long debug of the issue, which comes down to a subtlety with making copies of PermutationGroup_generic and its __dict__. Best, Travis On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 3:57:59 AM UTC+9 Trevor Karn wrote: > Sorry of course the parent of kH(a) and kH.one() are the same. We do