Re: [sage-devel] Solving quintics

Thanks, David, that´s very helpful. I will look a bit deeper into these approaches. Kind regards Achim David Roe schrieb am Freitag, 5. August 2022 um 23:11:54 UTC+2: > Hi Achim, > Many of the polynomials you mention can be factored by Sage if you use > number fields for your coefficients rath

[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 9:49:21 PM UTC-7 John H Palmieri wrote: > The following packages do not build for me on OS X 12.5 (Monterrey), Intel > chip: > >- polylib (#33758) >- symengine_py (#34141) >- p_group_cohomology (#30787) >- r_jupyter >- rubiks > > I propose that

[sage-devel] Proposal: downgrade some packages to experimental

The following packages do not build for me on OS X 12.5 (Monterrey), Intel chip: - polylib (#33758) - symengine_py (#34141) - p_group_cohomology (#30787) - r_jupyter - rubiks I propose that these be downgraded from optional to experimental until the issues are fixed. What do p

[sage-devel] Doctesting question: feature detection

If I run "make ptestlong", then I see something like this: ### make ptestlong: Running ./sage -t --logfile=logs/test.log --long -p --optional=sage,optional --all Features to be detected: ... Using --optional=homebrew,pip,sage,sage_spkg and then after the tests Features detected for doctesting:

Re: [sage-devel] Solving quintics

Hi Achim, Many of the polynomials you mention can be factored by Sage if you use number fields for your coefficients rather than the symbolic ring. For example: sage: R. = ZZ[] sage: K. = NumberField(x^2 + x + 1) sage: f = x^5 + 9/2 * x^4 - 5/2 * x^3 - 2*w * x^2 - 9*w * x + 5*w sage: f.factor() (

[sage-devel] Solving quintics

Hello, I am new to this group and got the suggestion to post this here which I am happy to do. If you are interested in polynomials, esp. solving quintics, you may have a look at CoCalc -- Development I have spent some time studying q

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for sphinx background style

detoned > grayish >> original In grayish, the color for large code blocks is nearly the same as that for inline code (which is also used for methods), so some visual information is lost compared to detoned. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Polling for sphinx background style

On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 10:06, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > grayish > detoned > original. I have no strong opinion on this choice! John > > Eric. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop rece

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for sphinx background style

grayish > detoned > original. Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web vi

[sage-devel] Re: Polling for sphinx background style

grayish > detoned >> original On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 12:51:46 AM UTC-6 sver...@gmail.com wrote: > grayish (3) > > The green in (1) is quite an eyesore, I think. > > On Friday, August 5, 2022 at 5:25:36 AM UTC+2 Kwankyu Lee wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> According to the recent decision, I applied s