I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33153 for this.
On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 9:20:55 AM UTC-8 bae...@gmail.com wrote:
> Indeed, adding the flag
> export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wno-error=return-type"
> fixed the problem. Never had to do this in the past though.
>
> Thanks a lot fo
Indeed, adding the flag
export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wno-error=return-type"
fixed the problem. Never had to do this in the past though.
Thanks a lot for the help!
Michael Orlitzky schrieb am Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2022 um 14:18:20 UTC+1:
> On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 10:19 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
See https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/81unMG60MyU/m/iDXLIDc0EAAJ -
this comes in through the sysconfig of opensuse's python3.
This should be reported as a bug to opensuse.
On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 5:48:04 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:35 PM Michael
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:35 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 13:27 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > > to see if it can be overridden. But it would be nice to track down the
> > > source of the -Werror so that it can be fixed for others.
> >
> > I have found it - it's absense o
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 13:27 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > to see if it can be overridden. But it would be nice to track down the
> > source of the -Werror so that it can be fixed for others.
>
> I have found it - it's absense of return statement in an inline
> function in an fflas-ffpack header
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:18 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 10:19 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > Basically, your C++ compiler is too strict.
>
> I think it's just the CFLAGS that are too strict:
>
> error: Command "gcc-10 -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG
>
On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 10:19 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Basically, your C++ compiler is too strict.
I think it's just the CFLAGS that are too strict:
error: Command "gcc-10 -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -DNDEBUG
-O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong
-funwind-table
Currently, the cover relations of a poset are returned as lists:
sage: P = Posets(4)[3]
sage: P.cover_relations()
[[0, 1], [0, 2], [0, 3]]
This seems to be a bad choice, because lists are not hashable, and also
somewhat inconsistent, because edges of graphs are returned as tuples.
The same goes
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:18 AM Christian Bär wrote:
>
> On recent opensuse tumbleweed 20220109 sagemath 9.5rc0 still does not
> compile. Tested on different hardware configurations.
>
> The install.log and all package log files which contain an error can be found
> here: https://baernextcloud.m
On recent opensuse tumbleweed 20220109 sagemath 9.5rc0 still does not
compile. Tested on different hardware configurations.
The install.log and all package log files which contain an error can be
found here:
https://baernextcloud.math.uni-potsdam.de/index.php/s/ofG2zfYXR3fkrLz
It looks like a
10 matches
Mail list logo
