Re: [sage-devel] Re: commits

Hi Sage devs, William wrote: > - The pace of development has been much higher > after 2015 than before, and it's stayed quite steady > from 2015 until now. Very impressive. Nice! That's something that GitHub shows well. > - In terms of "number of commits", somebody > who isn't me is about

Re: [sage-devel] Re: commits

Yes, ODK was an absolutely massively good thing for Sage Dev. Thanks to everyone involved in that. On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 1:36 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2021, 21:22 Kwankyu Lee, wrote: > >> >> On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 2:17:35 AM UTC+9 wst...@gmail.com wrote: >> >>>

Re: [sage-devel] Re: commits

On Thu, 23 Dec 2021, 21:22 Kwankyu Lee, wrote: > > On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 2:17:35 AM UTC+9 wst...@gmail.com wrote: > >> - There are 15 people with over 1000 commits, which is a healthy range >> of distinct "top contributors" for an open source project. >> > > Much thanks to the leaders!

[sage-devel] Re: commits

On Friday, December 24, 2021 at 2:17:35 AM UTC+9 wst...@gmail.com wrote: > - There are 15 people with over 1000 commits, which is a healthy range > of distinct "top contributors" for an open source project. > Much thanks to the leaders! The graph clearly shows that there was a critical point b

[sage-devel] Re: Source Build Fails on GCC-10

On Thursday, December 23, 2021 at 8:51:37 AM UTC-8 jorda...@gmail.com wrote: > Is Conda installing executable / binaries of packages in its environments, > not just python packages? > Yes. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To u

[sage-devel] Re: Source Build Fails on GCC-10

I take it back. The above, for which sage tells me /usr/local, but when I try to run it, it says: Traceback (most recent call last): File "././sage-config", line 5, in from sage_conf import _main ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sage_conf' Traceback (most recent call last): File "./.

[sage-devel] Re: Source Build Fails on GCC-10

I guess I misunderstood--I thought that it used both system packages and a python environment. I understood from reading the install guide that installing the system ones were supposed to reduce compile t

[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

Le jeudi 23 décembre 2021 à 03:16:13 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > Sure, that sounds like a good idea. > > In the above example, I used LatexExpr as a place holder for _bold_command, but maybe there is a better way (at least, LatexExpr has the advantage to not require any new injection in