[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

2021-12-22 Thread John H Palmieri
Sure, that sounds like a good idea. - John On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 3:05:44 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2021 à 00:26:58 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > >> I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to >> make its behavior ea

[sage-devel] Re: Source Build Fails on GCC-10

2021-12-22 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Don't try to mix system packages and conda packages. Pick a method. Either work with Debian packages (apt-get) and deactivate all conda. Or set up and activate the conda environment; and don't try to override compilers. Also, do not use "./configure --prefix=$CONDA_PREFIX" -- this is not suppor

[sage-devel] Source Build Fails on GCC-10

2021-12-22 Thread jorda...@gmail.com
I'm trying to build SageMath from source on Ubuntu 20.04. Below is the exact process I tried to follow (taking notes to be able to pass to other students with little/no linux experience--like me--so I try to explain each step), but the build crashed on trying to build gcc-10 with "undefined

[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

2021-12-22 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 3:26:58 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote: > I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to > make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want > \mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}. > If we are keeping \Bold f

[sage-devel] Re: \Bold command definition in every LaTeX output

2021-12-22 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2021 à 00:26:58 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit : > I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to > make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want > \mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}. > The customization could