Re: [sage-devel] Re: singular crash

I would rather suspect pexpect for being flaky, than a Singular bug. On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, 00:14 Michael Orlitzky, wrote: > On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 14:59 -0800, Volker Braun wrote: > > I'm seeing these fail regularly (and randomly) > > > > > > Are these system (i.e. non-SPKG) installs of Singular?

Re: [sage-devel] Re: singular crash

On Fri, 2021-11-12 at 14:59 -0800, Volker Braun wrote: > I'm seeing these fail regularly (and randomly) > > Are these system (i.e. non-SPKG) installs of Singular? We're accepting anything newer than v4.1.0, but if some particular version is buggy we should exclude it. -- You received this mes

[sage-devel] Re: singular crash

I'm seeing these fail regularly (and randomly) On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:38:44 PM UTC+1 vdelecroix wrote: > Dear all, > > I just set up a patchbot but two tests related to singular fail. The > singular it uses was compiled from source. See the patchbot report > at https://patchbot.sagemat

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:17 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > > > > No, we should revise the documentation so that it does not advertise "make > > test" any more. > > No, if we use autotools/make to build a project, there should be >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 10:17 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > No, we should revise the documentation so that it does not advertise "make > test" any more. No, if we use autotools/make to build a project, there should be meaningful make targets for testing too, force people to learn peculiarit

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

I have added this as a task to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30453 On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:17:05 PM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote: > No, we should revise the documentation so that it does not advertise "make > test" any more. > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:09:12 PM UTC-8 Di

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

No, we should revise the documentation so that it does not advertise "make test" any more. On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:09:12 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 8:20:24 PM UTC Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> Yes, if one is not using the Sage distribution for bu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 8:20:24 PM UTC Matthias Koeppe wrote: > Yes, if one is not using the Sage distribution for build, one should also > not use it for testing. > Use "sage -t". > that's not nice. Should we have a ./configure option that just blesses all deps as "coming from the sy

[sage-devel] Re: prime_pi gives wrong output

This is a known bug. The additional example could be added as a comment on trac ticket #24960 . On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 12:49:24 PM UTC-7 martin@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > prime_pi(281474961965055) gives correct output 8731188419994. > > pr

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

Yes, if one is not using the Sage distribution for build, one should also not use it for testing. Use "sage -t". On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 10:39:47 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:01 PM Matthias Koeppe > wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:42:09 AM

[sage-devel] prime_pi gives wrong output

Hello, prime_pi(281474961965055) gives correct output 8731188419994. prime_pi(281474961965056) gives wrong result 8731188419993. Please note that second input is greater than first, however it produces smaller number of primes. The second output is obviously wrong. It was tested on CoCalc.c

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 5:01 PM Matthias Koeppe wrote: > > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:42:09 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:36:00 AM UTC Matthias Koeppe wrote: >>> >>> I have updated the instructions. >> >> >> Thanks - are these tested? > > > Yes, I te

[sage-devel] singular crash

Dear all, I just set up a patchbot but two tests related to singular fail. The singular it uses was compiled from source. See the patchbot report at https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/32859/ sage -t --long --warn-long 42.4 --random-seed=24651699140802493978117085271929917492 src/sage/interfa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 2:42:09 AM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:36:00 AM UTC Matthias Koeppe wrote: > >> I have updated the instructions. > > > Thanks - are these tested? > Yes, I tested them on macOS Big Sur. -- You received this message because yo

Re: [sage-devel] is coersion always tried in conversion code?

I'm not following the discussion on that ticket completely, but it's hard to see a situation where there'd be a speed benefit to trying coercion first. Here's why: Given two parents A and B, if you try to convert an element of A into B Sage computes and stores a convert map. However, in order to

[sage-devel] is coersion always tried in conversion code?

This came up on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32851 - is there any speed benefit to explicitly try to do coersion before trying conversion? Thanks Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop rec

Re: [sage-devel] Re: pip-21.1.2 compile fails on MacOS

On Friday, November 12, 2021 at 6:36:00 AM UTC Matthias Koeppe wrote: > I have updated the instructions. Thanks - are these tested? I've changed the release version at the bottom, so that it does not look like something untouched since Sage 9.2 > > On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 4:27:3