[sage-devel] Re: Another failure to build Sage 9.4 from source

2021-09-03 Thread Matthias Koeppe
>From the log: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -pthread -shared -Wl,-O1 -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-rpath-link,/home/pi/Sage/sage-9.4/local/lib -L/home/pi/Sage/sage-9.4/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/home/pi/Sage/sage-9.4/local/lib -shared -O2 -g build/temp.linux-armv7l-3.7/build/src.linux-armv7l

Re: [sage-devel] Small question: title capitalization

2021-09-03 Thread davida...@gmail.com
Thank you very much. It indeed makes a lot of sense to adopt Python's guidelines. I will open a ticket concerning the inconsistencies. Le vendredi 3 septembre 2021 à 14:46:01 UTC-4, wst...@gmail.com a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 10:05 AM davida...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Small question: title capitalization

2021-09-03 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 10:05 AM davida...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a small question: > > What is the SageMath convention regarding title capitalization? > > It seems that there are some inconsistencies about title capitalization in > the documentation: some titles are capitalized, a

[sage-devel] Small question: title capitalization

2021-09-03 Thread davida...@gmail.com
Hello, I have a small question: What is the SageMath convention regarding title capitalization? It seems that there are some inconsistencies about title capitalization in the documentation: some titles are capitalized, and some are not (see for example: doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/numbe

[sage-devel] Re: patchbot trouble

2021-09-03 Thread 'Martin R' via sage-devel
removing the file `not_tested.py` seems to help. Martin R schrieb am Donnerstag, 2. September 2021 um 10:10:13 UTC+2: > Unfortunately, I keep getting a strange test failure in my patchbot > install. When run alone, the test passes. It only occurs when executing > > LANG=C.UTF-8 python3 -m sage

[sage-devel] minimize_constrained is not consistent with different variable names

2021-09-03 Thread Pol del Aguila Pla
I've encountered a bug in minimize_constrained where it seems that the variable name has an effect on the result. My guess is that this happens somewhere along the translation from symbolic to numerical function. Attached is a minimal notebook to reproduce the bug. Run in the latest docker imag