Maybe related with
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31948
which you reviewed.
On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 1:45:48 AM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> observed with the latest beta on Linux and macOS:
>
> ...
> [dochtml] [reference] valuations: 1 todos, 14 index, 0 citations, 13
> modules
> [d
On Tuesday, 20 July 2021 at 10:26:54 UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:23 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel
> wrote:
> >
> > So, do you have an alternative idea on how to translate these results
> from FriCAS to sage? I guess the most interesting application is in
> symbo
Hi, all,
I stumbled across what seems to be a bug/missing feature/misunderstanding while
experimenting with orders.
Let f be a univariate polynomial (say, over QQ). I used both quadratic and
cubic polynomials.
Then the following leads to an unexpected problem:
K. = NumberField(f)
OK = K.max
Could you elaborate on this? I guess you have better examples, but here is
one for illustration:
(1) -> integrate(1/(1+x+x^3),x)
(1)
+---+
| 2 +--+
(\|- 93 %%E0 + 12 - \|31 %%E0)
*
log
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:23 AM 'Martin R' via sage-devel
wrote:
>
> So, do you have an alternative idea on how to translate these results from
> FriCAS to sage? I guess the most interesting application is in symbolic
> integration, where rootOf objects appear frequently.
As far as integratio
So, do you have an alternative idea on how to translate these results from
FriCAS to sage? I guess the most interesting application is in symbolic
integration, where rootOf objects appear frequently.
Nils Bruin schrieb am Dienstag, 20. Juli 2021 um 02:42:46 UTC+2:
> On Monday, 19 July 2021 at
