[sage-devel] Re: Proposal: Making cmake a standard package

2021-07-16 Thread Antonio Rojas
El viernes, 16 de julio de 2021 a las 22:44:22 UTC+2, Matthias Koeppe escribió: > cmake is an advanced build system and currently an optional package, as it > is only used for building optional or experimental packages. > I propose to make cmake a standard package ( > https://trac.sagemath.org

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Making cmake a standard package

2021-07-16 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 2021-07-16 13:44:21, Matthias Koeppe wrote: > I propose to make cmake a standard package We're going to have to do it sooner or later. Might as well be sooner. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Making cmake a standard package

2021-07-16 Thread François Bissey
+1 > On 17/07/2021, at 09:26, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > +1 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Making cmake a standard package

2021-07-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
+1 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/m

[sage-devel] Re: Preventing SageMath 9.3 from installing Python packages

2021-07-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Another option is installing via Conda. https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubsc

Re: [sage-devel] Proposal: Making cmake a standard package

2021-07-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, 21:44 Matthias Koeppe, wrote: > cmake is an advanced build system and currently an optional package, as it > is only used for building optional or experimental packages. > I propose to make cmake a standard package ( > https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32213). (It is available

[sage-devel] Proposal: Making cmake a standard package

2021-07-16 Thread Matthias Koeppe
cmake is an advanced build system and currently an optional package, as it is only used for building optional or experimental packages. I propose to make cmake a standard package (https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32213). (It is available as a system package on all supported platforms/distributio

[sage-devel] Re: Preventing SageMath 9.3 from installing Python packages

2021-07-16 Thread Matthias Koeppe
This is not supported by the Sage distribution. Please report the build errors. On Friday, July 16, 2021 at 8:03:35 AM UTC-7 maxime.boi...@calculquebec.ca wrote: > Hi, > > The SageMath build scripts insists on building and installing Python > packages as "SPKG". How do I disable that ? > > It i

[sage-devel] Preventing SageMath 9.3 from installing Python packages

2021-07-16 Thread Maxime Boissonneault
Hi, The SageMath build scripts insists on building and installing Python packages as "SPKG". How do I disable that ? It is failing to build a lot of them on our system, and it should not build any of them because we already have prebuilt or preinstalled packages for those. Thanks, Maxime Boiss

[sage-devel] Re: Flint-2.8.0 Beta testing

2021-07-16 Thread 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
Hi all, I've now tagged 2.8.0-rc1, our first release candidate for the flint-2.8 branch. Development on trunk now continues for the next release. Please report all remaining issue to our GitHub issue tracker. We will issue release candidates until there are no further critical issues reported for

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Registering NumberField as numbers.Number

2021-07-16 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel
Thanks for the answers. I didn't realize this whole issue was this involved. It's certainly interesting. For now I think there is nothing wrong with registering `NumberFieldElement` as `numbers.Numbers`, see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32206. Jonathan mathzeta2 schrieb am Donnerstag, 1