Re: [sage-devel] pynac fails to build (sage 9.4.beta4, clang)

Should be solved by the move to penal-0.7.29. This is the same kind of errors that I fixed for g++11. > On 10/07/2021, at 08:06, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > I am not able to build pynac with clang because of the error > > error: no member named 'nume

[sage-devel] Flint-2.8.0 Beta testing

Hi all, After a successful Flint-2.8.0-dev release a few months back, we have decided to enter beta testing of Flint-2.8.0. I have therefore tagged flint-2.8.0-beta1 on GitHub. Please report issues to our issue tracker: https://github.com/wbhart/flint2/issues It is expected that release candida

Re: [sage-devel] linbox does not build with clang (sage 9.4.bet4)

Not really. sage configure script was happy with givaro from my system. This givaro is compiled with gcc and the option "-fabi-version=6". The linbox configure script makes a query to givaro to get these options. I can not change them. I did force the compilation of givaro during the sage build a

Re: [sage-devel] linbox does not build with clang (sage 9.4.bet4)

You can replace `-fabi-version=6` with `-D__GXX_ABI_VERSION=1006`. Isuru On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 4:51 AM Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I tried to build sage 9.4.beta4 using clang 12.0.0. It failed for > linbox with > > /usr/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CXX

Re: [sage-devel] block vector

Hi, Am 09.07.21 um 12:00 schrieb Thierry: On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 06:30:57AM +0200, Clemens Heuberger wrote: Is there any recommendation on how to construct "block vectors" (in analogy to `sage.matrix.special.block_matrix`) in readable way? We probably do not have subdivisions of vectors in t

Re: [sage-devel] block vector

Hi, On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 06:30:57AM +0200, Clemens Heuberger wrote: > > Is there any recommendation on how to construct "block vectors" (in analogy > to `sage.matrix.special.block_matrix`) in readable way? > > We probably do not have subdivisions of vectors in the same way as we have > subdiv

Re: [sage-devel] Re: upgrade sagecell (http -> https)

Thank you for your answer. 😀 2021년 7월 4일 일요일 오전 4시 52분 45초 UTC+9에 marc@gmail.com님이 작성: > It is not a good idea to use a self-signed certificate since most browsers > will refuse to connect or require extra steps to do so. A much better > approach is to use a certbot