On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 11:02 PM Max Alekseyev wrote:
>
> I'll try the source distribution, but I'd like to mention that building
> optional packages from a binary distribution worked well in earlier Sage
> versions (e.g., 9.1 and 9.2)
please bear with us. We aim at
pip install sagemath -u
I'll try the source distribution, but I'd like to mention that building
optional packages from a binary distribution worked well in earlier Sage
versions (e.g., 9.1 and 9.2)
Regards,
Max
On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 5:50:20 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:37 PM Max
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:37 PM Max Alekseyev wrote:
>
> I installed Sage from sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
this is a binary distribution. It doesn't really allow for building
optional packages.
Please get the source distribution instead.
>
> I've just run
>
> make python3-clean
> ./bo
We would need to see config.log again to know why.
On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 2:37:38 PM UTC-7 max...@gmail.com wrote:
> I installed Sage from sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
>
> I've just run
>
> make python3-clean
> ./bootstrap
> ./configure
>
> but it still complaints that python3 is not
I installed Sage from sage-9.3-Ubuntu_20.04-x86_64.tar.bz2
I've just run
make python3-clean
./bootstrap
./configure
but it still complaints that python3 is not installed in the system.
Why?
Regards,
Max
On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 5:32:56 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 20
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:20 PM Max Alekseyev wrote:
>
> Please find config.log attached. The system has Python 3.8.5 installed.
## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG python3... ##
## ##
configure:32260: python3 has already been
I've just followed your suggestion and noticed that 'configure' produced
the following warning:
===
notice: the following SPKGs did not find equivalent system packages:
python3 _recommended boost cbc cmake coxeter3 gp2c graphviz
igraph isl libsemigroups libxml2 lrslib ninja_build
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 9:46 PM Max Alekseyev wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to, but Sage somehow decides that it needs to build its own
> Python from scratch.
> I simply sun 'sage -i pynormaliz' and get a broken sage as a result.
> What's wrong?
>
we are trying to switch to a sane building scheme:
./b
please post top-level config.log
Do you have python3 excecutable, version 3.7 or newer?
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 9:46 PM Max Alekseyev wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to, but Sage somehow decides that it needs to build its own
> Python from scratch.
> I simply sun 'sage -i pynormaliz' and get a broken
I'd be happy to, but Sage somehow decides that it needs to build its own
Python from scratch.
I simply sun 'sage -i pynormaliz' and get a broken sage as a result.
What's wrong?
Regards,
Max
On Friday, June 18, 2021 at 4:42:00 PM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> don't build Python, use one from t
don't build Python, use one from the system.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021, 21:09 Max Alekseyev, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to install PyNormaliz within freshly installed Sage 9.3 within
> freshly installed Ubuntu 20.04.02 LTS.It breaks giving the following error:
>
> ===
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/Sag
You're not using many packages from the system, e.g. you built gmp
(and so everything that depends on it).
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 5:47 PM John Cremona wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 14:52, John Cremona wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 14:26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Ju
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 14:52, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 14:26, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 2:03 PM John Cremona wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 11:29, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Samuel Lelièvre
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 2:03 PM John Cremona wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 11:29, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Samuel Lelièvre
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 2021-06-17 18:47 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > > >
> > > > I think it's not the 1st time we see a bug report rela
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 11:29, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Samuel Lelièvre
> wrote:
> >
> > 2021-06-17 18:47 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> > >
> > > I think it's not the 1st time we see a bug report related to readline
> > > on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.
> > >
> > > Please see
> >
On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:20 AM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> 2021-06-17 18:47 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
> >
> > I think it's not the 1st time we see a bug report related to readline
> > on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.
> >
> > Please see
> > https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/wkObkoZQpe4/m/lWDVCrfgAgAJ
> >
2021-06-17 18:47 UTC, Dima Pasechnik:
>
> I think it's not the 1st time we see a bug report related to readline
> on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS.
>
> Please see
> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-release/c/wkObkoZQpe4/m/lWDVCrfgAgAJ
>
> Unfortunately I didn't hear back from Samuel regarding the problem
> wit
17 matches
Mail list logo
