Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum Python version to 3.8

2021-05-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:52 PM David Roe wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 6:09 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:34 AM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel >> wrote: >> > >> > Own tag might be a goood way forward as the code itself can run on Python >> > 3.7 by avoidi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum Python version to 3.8

2021-05-13 Thread David Roe
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 6:09 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:34 AM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel > wrote: > > > > Own tag might be a goood way forward as the code itself can run on > Python 3.7 by avoiding the multiprocessing. It would be purely to state > that we don't

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum Python version to 3.8

2021-05-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 1:34 AM 'Travis Scrimshaw' via sage-devel wrote: > > Own tag might be a goood way forward as the code itself can run on Python 3.7 > by avoiding the multiprocessing. It would be purely to state that we don't > want to test the mp parts of the code. How do I make an option

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Minimum Python version to 3.8

2021-05-13 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel
It looks to me as if all of this ticket can be "fixed" to work with python 3.7 by just trying to import shared_memory. `start_worker_pool` should probably raise a proper error message, if the import of shared_memory failed previosly. The few doctests that explicitly call `start_worker_pool` can