I'd say that for a "full" evaluation at a list of images V for all
variables, a guide would be that f(*V) should be roughly:
sum(c*prod(m^e for e,m in zip(es,V)) for es,c in f.dict().items())
Only roughly, though, because for, for instance, if f==0, then this code
evaluates to an empty sum, so
PS: Fedora 32 EOL is imminent (= 4 weeks after the just-released fedora
34), so I wouldn't worry too much about it
On Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 12:24:23 PM UTC+2 Volker Braun wrote:
> This is c++11 dual abi, see
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html
>
> IMHO we just
This is c++11 dual abi, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/using_dual_abi.html
IMHO we just shouldn't use the system version then, but building Sage with
-D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 should allow you to link with old-style abi
libraries.
The default value of _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_A
Dear all,
Sage currently supports in a weird way partial substitution
of multivariate polynomials
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: S. = QQ[]
sage: p = x
sage: p.subs(x=q)
q
sage: p.subs(x=q).parent()
Univariate Polynomial Ring in q over Rational Field
What is annoying in the above scenario is that it brea
