Oops, thanks for catching the mistake
S.
* dmo...@deductivepress.ca [2021-01-17 12:01:41]:
I agree that this needs to be fixed. Offhand, I don't know what the answer
should be (for example, (1/(x*y), 0) also seems reasonable), but (0,1) is
certainly not correct. So please do open a ticket.
Pl
On Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 9:28:02 AM UTC-8 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> If you know how to do this, please help users by adding instructions to
our documentation - https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30476
Thanks to several people's patient help with this, the Sage installation
manual now con
I agree that this needs to be fixed. Offhand, I don't know what the answer
should be (for example, (1/(x*y), 0) also seems reasonable), but (0,1) is
certainly not correct. So please do open a ticket.
Please correct the typo when you make the ticket, though: q*y + r == x
should be q*y + r == 1/
Dear all,
can someone please confirm that the current behaviour of sage is not the
expected one before I open a ticket about it?
sage: R. = LaurentPolynomialRing(QQ)
sage: q,r = (1/x).quo_rem(y) ; q,r
(0, 1)
sage: q*y + r == x
False
The correct
