2020-10-08 17:45:11 UTC, Zachary Scherr:
>
> I think I've learned my lesson about over installing homebrew packages.
> I previously installed every single homebrew version of all Sage SPKGs
> in case I could speed up build time.
I did the same and got bitten too. Packages that gave me trouble:
arb
Thank you Matthias. I think I've learned my lesson about over installing
homebrew packages. I previously installed every single homebrew version of
all Sage SPKGs in case I could speed up build time. At some point I'd like
to learn more about the sage build process so that I can contribute in
I have pushed some of these tickets forward to milestone 9.3.
Here is an updated report on critical/blocker tickets that excludes tickets
already marked "sage-9.3" or "sage-pending".
https://trac.sagemath.org/query?priority=critical&priority=blocker&status=needs_info&status=needs_review&status=ne
I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30745 for this and the other
error with ecl, which I think have a common cause.
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 7:33:32 AM UTC-7, Zachary Scherr wrote:
>
> I was just curious as to what the status of this issue is, and if there
> was anything I co
2020-10-07 18:22:31 UTC, Zachary Scherr:
>
> You should probably follow the directions here:
> https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html
>
> and install sage into its own environment so that it correctly installs
> all the dependencies. Sage 9.2 will support python 3.8.
>
Also d
It is rather hard to see how an issue on a ticket opened 11 years ago and
still not resolved can be deemed "critical". Perhaps someone should revise
the status of some of these.
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 11:12:57 AM UTC+1 Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> The Sage 9.2 cycle
