Re: [sage-devel] Changes to bitset.pxi

2020-09-17 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel
Ok. I don't think CRoaring serves well for my purpose. I'm getting multiples of my benchmarks (something like a factor of 10). Things are ok for small instances, but it seems that the bookkeeping explodes. I thought about it this afternoon and I don't think anything optimized for memory would w

Re: [sage-devel] Changes to bitset.pxi

2020-09-17 Thread 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-devel
CRoaring definitely uses advanced CPU-instructions. It might not be used everywhere possible (e.g. I don't see a distinction between AVX and AVX2, which means that in one of those cases something is missing). I got a prompt reply regarding my pull request (that the pull request needs work). So

Re: [sage-devel] Changes to bitset.pxi

2020-09-17 Thread Vincent Delecroix
About 2: the C library CRoaring seems a good match but does not seem to contain any assembler or advanced CPU instructions. Does it? It is hard to figure out how well is implemented and maintained the Python interface PyRoaringBitMap. Le 16/09/2020 à 17:18, 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via sage-de

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

2020-09-17 Thread Nicolo' Piazzalunga
Problem seems now solved. I updated ticket #30539, where I included extra pari spkgs. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr.