Re: [sage-devel] Matrix(GF(2^n)) with large n not working on SageMath 9.1

Looks like this is probably fixed by https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29818 On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 12:24:00 AM UTC-4 dmo...@deductivepress.ca wrote: > I confirm that the error occurs on CoCalc (with the > 9.1 or Development kernel), so there certainly seems to be a

Re: [sage-devel] Matrix(GF(2^n)) with large n not working on SageMath 9.1

I confirm that the error occurs on CoCalc (with the 9.1 or Development kernel), so there certainly seems to be a bug somewhere, even though I do not get an error on my own computer (MacOS 10.15.5). F. = GF(2 ^ 64) Matrix(F, 5, 5)

Re: [sage-devel] Matrix(GF(2^n)) with large n not working on SageMath 9.1

On 13/8/20 8:02 pm, Zihan Zheng wrote: > Hi developers, > > I think I found a bug of SageMath 9.1 > > *F. = GF(2 ^ 64)* > *Matrix(F, 5, 5)* > > This piece of code runs without error on SageMath 8.9 and 9.0, but > throws error on 9.1 > > (reproducible on cocalc.com) > > *OverflowError: Python int to

[sage-devel] Matrix(GF(2^n)) with large n not working on SageMath 9.1

Hi developers, I think I found a bug of SageMath 9.1 *F. = GF(2 ^ 64)* *Matrix(F, 5, 5)* This piece of code runs without error on SageMath 8.9 and 9.0, but throws error on 9.1 (reproducible on cocalc.com) *OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to C unsigned long* Best, Zihan -- Yo

[sage-devel] Reference manual "Quick search" box, online and offline

1. The online SageMath reference manual at https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/index.html has a "Quick search" box in the left column. It works, albeit with some JavaScript trouble: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29576 which could take some love... Anyone with that skills? 2