[sage-devel] Transpiling from Mathematica syntax to sage backends

(I posted a much longer and more detailed version of this the other day, but I don't see it posted. So here is a shorter version) I'm curious of any consideration has been giving for transpiling from one CAS syntax to another instead of or right before sage.repl.preparse(). In particular, I wa

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 2:34 PM Nicolo' Piazzalunga wrote: > > Sure, just let me know what to do. > In the meantime, let me note that I can build both R-3.6.2 and R-4.0.2 > standalone with ./configure --with-x=no you can go to the directory where R was being built by Sage (where exactly you can se

[sage-devel] Re: [Bug] Possible Bug in FrobeniusMap for ntl finite fields of characteristic 2

This bug is discussed in trac ticket #28617 (which recently received a patch). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an emai

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

Edit build/bin/sage-guess-package-system, build/bin/sage-print-system-package-command, build/bin/write-dockerfile.sh, tox.ini, and add voidlinux.txt files in build/pkgs/ similar to https://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit?id=eecd68a1a3cd6046a6ae0d4b5eb57895ee34a1ba More info: https://doc.sagem

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

Sure, just let me know what to do. In the meantime, let me note that I can build both R-3.6.2 and R-4.0.2 standalone with ./configure --with-x=no On 7/3/20 3:30 PM, Matthias Koeppe wrote: We will need your help to replicate a voidlinux system for testing – see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

We will need your help to replicate a voidlinux system for testing – see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30044 On Thursday, July 2, 2020 at 11:08:17 AM UTC-7, Nicolo' wrote: > > I can build R-4.0.2 as standalone, why does it fail in Sage? > As for ecl, perhaps wait until we can use system one?

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020, 13:33 Nicolo' Piazzalunga, wrote: > Let me clarify: my problem is that Sage still fails to build (r and ecl > give errors). > As for ecl, I think I understand the problem (a patch is needed for > musl), but could ecl trigger failure of r, which I can however build as > a stand

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

Let me clarify: my problem is that Sage still fails to build (r and ecl give errors). As for ecl, I think I understand the problem (a patch is needed for musl), but could ecl trigger failure of r, which I can however build as a standalone? At this stage, I have no issues building stuff that co

Re: [sage-devel] build errors on void linux

Your gmp installation is incomplete, missing C++ support, therefore all the packages that depend on gmp are installed,and not taken from the system. And there are dozens such packages, eg mpfr,ntl, arb, flint, pari, eclib... from your config.log: configure:10030: checking gmp.h usability configur