Re: [sage-devel] Re: finite dimensional submodules of infinite dimensional ones

On June 9, 2020 7:35:51 PM GMT-03:00, Matthias Koeppe wrote: >See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19448 > Ohh wow! That's been active really recently! Thanks, I'll merge the ticket into my branch. R. >On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 2:43:04 PM UTC-7, Reimundo Heluani wrote: >> >> I am trying

[sage-devel] Re: finite dimensional submodules of infinite dimensional ones

See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19448 On Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 2:43:04 PM UTC-7, Reimundo Heluani wrote: > > I am trying to reuse the code already in place in combinat/freemodule and > modules/with_basis/subquotients to construct a finite dimensional > submodule of > an infinite dimensi

[sage-devel] finite dimensional submodules of infinite dimensional ones

I am trying to reuse the code already in place in combinat/freemodule and modules/with_basis/subquotients to construct a finite dimensional submodule of an infinite dimensional one. I think that there are places where the basis of the ambient space is assumed to be a list without needing it. The

[sage-devel] For your attention : Mathematica interface : one less bug, and one more.

Fiddling with this ask.sagemath question , I was led to create Trac#29833 ; further review of possibly related tickets showed that the old Trac#14764

[sage-devel] `_acted_upon_` computes result twice

If I act upon a polyhedron, the result is computed twice. Why does this happen, how can one avoid this? Currently, in `Polyhedron_base` (the element class) the method `_acted_upon_` is defined, which is where the action is discovered. In the following example, I try to act on a polyhedron with

[sage-devel] Young Researcher School in Math and Computer Science (June 8th - 18th, 2020)

Bonjour, We are currently organizing the Young Researcher School in Math and Computer Science from June 8th to 18th, 2020. Supposed to be organized in April in Bordeaux, we decided to go online as a web-School. The schedule and the pdf of the book published at CNRS editions and prepared for the

[sage-devel] Inconsistencies in solve

Fooling around with a ask.sagemath question , and perusing the known symbolics problems (most notably Trac#21789 ), I was led to reported solve problems. It seems that some tickets such as T