> * is there any example of a package using Travis CI testing on sage9 and
> maybe with docker that I could use as an example?
>
Yes, we do that for SnapPy. The relevant files are here:
https://github.com/3-manifolds/SnapPy/blob/master/.travis.yml
https://github.com/3-manifolds/SnapPy/blob/m
On Saturday, April 4, 2020 at 2:27:18 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
>
>
> I gather that sage_sample would best
> switch to using Sage's conda distribution, right?. Would you have a
> recommendation between using Travis CI or GitHub Actions?
>
It's probably easiest to stay with Travis CI so
Thanks Matthias for the feedback! I gather that sage_sample would best
switch to using Sage's conda distribution, right?. Would you have a
recommendation between using Travis CI or GitHub Actions?
Cheers,
Nicolas
On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 09:40:54AM -0700, Matthias
On Saturday, April 4, 2020 at 8:35:55 AM UTC-4, Viviane Pons wrote:
>
> I am adapting the sage_sample package (
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage_sample) to make it work on sage 9 /
> python 3. At the moment, my local install works but I have problems
> installing the new sage image on the Travi
Dear Viviane,
we now have a capability to test Sage using Docker and GitHub Actions.
No Travis CI.
cf https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29401
HTH
Dima
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020, 20:35 Viviane Pons, wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am adapting the sage_sample package (
> https://github.com/sagemath/sage_sample)
Dear all,
I am adapting the sage_sample package (
https://github.com/sagemath/sage_sample) to make it work on sage 9 / python
3. At the moment, my local install works but I have problems installing the
new sage image on the TravisCI server. Also, I saw that it is possible to
use Docker with Travis
