Re: [sage-devel] nt.sagenb.org and sagenb.org

2020-03-10 Thread help
On Monday, March 9, 2020 at 10:46:05 AM UTC-7, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > Hi, > > we should do something with those file, since there are very good ideas > in there. > > How large is the whole nt.sagenb.org + sagenb.org data ? > There are 175 nt.sagenb.org published workshee

Re: [sage-devel] glpk and the message "Long-step dual simplex will be used"

2020-03-10 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 3/10/20 2:09 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > Ticket #24824 upgraded glpk to version 4.65, patching it so it doesn't > print a warning message "Long-step dual simplex will be used". What > should we do about system-wide installations of glpk? I recently > installed it using homebrew, and the result

[sage-devel] Re: yanking sage doctests in vim

2020-03-10 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Monday, March 9, 2020 at 4:25:18 PM UTC+1, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > > Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > > vnoremap Y :call YankSageTest(visualmode(), 1) > uh, there is a '>' missing at the end I get the same errors after adding the missing `>` at the end -- You received this message because you ar

Re: [sage-devel] glpk and the message "Long-step dual simplex will be used"

2020-03-10 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 6:09 PM John H Palmieri wrote: > > Ticket #24824 upgraded glpk to version 4.65, patching it so it doesn't print > a warning message "Long-step dual simplex will be used". What should we do > about system-wide installations of glpk? I recently installed it using > homebre

[sage-devel] Re: yanking sage doctests in vim

2020-03-10 Thread Simon King
Hi Marc, sorry, I still don't get what *exactly* one needs to do in order to achieve *what*. In your original mail, you wrote that it is "for copy-pasting examples and doctests to the sage repl". If I understand correctly, repl is abbreviation for read-eval-print-loop. I guess that' what I ca

Re: [sage-devel] nt.sagenb.org and sagenb.org

2020-03-10 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, March 9, 2020 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, Thierry (sage-googlesucks@xxx) wrote: > > Hi, > > we should do something with those file, since there are very good ideas > in there. > > How large is the whole nt.sagenb.org + sagenb.org data ? > > Ciao, > I know that the public sagenb.org wo

[sage-devel] glpk and the message "Long-step dual simplex will be used"

2020-03-10 Thread John H Palmieri
Ticket #24824 upgraded glpk to version 4.65, patching it so it doesn't print a warning message "Long-step dual simplex will be used". What should we do about system-wide installations of glpk? I recently installed it using homebrew, and the result was that Sage failed lots of tests, all because