Le dimanche 23 février 2020 22:51:35 UTC+1, Nicolas M. Thiéry a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
Gosh. In 2020, more than 20 years into unicode, our tool chain really
> ought to support unicode ... Time to move on to xelatex for building
> our pdf?
>
The current "line of the Party" seems to be that the fu
>
>
>> I can't remember where people were talking about arrows in 3d with Sage
>>> being broken in Sage 9,
>>>
>>
>> This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29206
>>
>
>
> Actually, the above ticket regards plots of individual vectors. But both
> plot_vector_field3d() and arrows3d() work well w
Le lundi 24 février 2020 18:59:42 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit :
>
> Le lundi 24 février 2020 17:24:48 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit :
>>
>> I can't remember where people were talking about arrows in 3d with Sage
>> being broken in Sage 9,
>>
>
> This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29206
>
A
Le lundi 24 février 2020 17:24:48 UTC+1, kcrisman a écrit :
>
> I can't remember where people were talking about arrows in 3d with Sage
> being broken in Sage 9,
>
This is https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/29206
Eric.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I can't remember where people were talking about arrows in 3d with Sage
being broken in Sage 9, but for what it's worth viewer="tachyon" continues
to seem to be okay, and viewer="jmol" (i.e. jsmol) seems to be slightly
better (though still weird) on the Sage cell server. Maybe that will help
p
