This is a basic problem with WebGL, which is what Three.js uses, as opposed
to the canvas renderer in Jmol/JSmol. The current version of WebGL does not
handle transparency very well, and there's not much we can do about that.
Transparent objects in WebGL are treated as if they are located entire
yes, it does not look too well in three.js in Jupyther notebook.
You can use jmol, just use
show(d1+d2+d3+d4+d5,viewer='jmol')
as the last command.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 4:46 PM João Palhoto Matos
wrote:
>
> The sage code producing the example and two 3d models, one correct produced
> with j
The sage code producing the example and two 3d models, one correct produced
with jsmol in sage 8.8, and other showing the problem produced with
three.js in sage 9.0beta6, are available from
https://cdi2tp.math.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/test#sage
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
The issue is that you redefined x after defining K. I wrote more on the
ticket.
David
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:57 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> This is a variable name clash. Somehow, using 'x' for modulus creates a
> problem.
> If I instead do
>
> T.=GF(2)[]
> K.=GF(2^6, modulus=xx^6 + xx^4 + xx
This is a variable name clash. Somehow, using 'x' for modulus creates a problem.
If I instead do
T.=GF(2)[]
K.=GF(2^6, modulus=xx^6 + xx^4 + xx^3 + xx + 1)
...
then everything works as expected.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:51 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/tic
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28786
Note that it only happens if modulus is explicitly given.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 9:47 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> yes, I can confirm this is still giving an error in the latest Sage
> beta. (9.0.beta6).
> Note that actually it's two identical i
