Dear Volker,
Wed 2019-09-18 07:09:34 UTC, Volker Braun:
> I can make an account on the buildbot worker
Thanks a lot!
Another macOS concern is discussed at
- sage-devel, 2019-09, Matthias Goerner
Scipy not compiling on Mac OS X
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/n3ctdwd-M0o/discus
This is probably the same as
https://github.com/sagemath/binary-pkg/issues/19
On Tuesday, September 17, 2019 at 12:23:53 AM UTC-4, Matthias Goerner wrote:
>
> I have Mac OS X 10.13 and I just downloaded the sage math 8.8 app dmg for
> Mac OS X 10.11 and 10.14 and tried to install ssl by running
Taking into account the fact that there is some kind of processing and
communication
time to the node when you issue such a command some drift by a second is not
unexpected.
And the output of pdsh has been sorted so you cannot see the order the time was
returned.
> On 19/09/2019, at 1:17 AM, Di
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 4:33 PM Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> The issue manifests itself incoherently: running ./configure and ./make
> multiple times resolved the issue at some point.
this is to be expected with unstable clocks. Sometimes it works, sometimes not.
Complain to the sysadmin...
I've
The issue manifests itself incoherently: running ./configure and ./make
multiple times resolved the issue at some point.
Marco
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 11:07:29 AM UTC-4, Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> Same issue with the package zeromq-4.2.5 now, see log attached.
>
> Marco
>
>
>
> On
Same issue with the package zeromq-4.2.5 now, see log attached.
Marco
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:55:35 AM UTC-4, Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> Now it builds correctly, thanks!
>
> Marco
>
> On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:49:33 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> We're getting
Now it builds correctly, thanks!
Marco
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:49:33 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> We're getting there :-)
> Please remove the files in
>
> build/pkgs/pynac/patches/
>
> and run make again.
>
> I worked on Sage 8.9.rc0 which has a newer pynac, sorry.
>
> O
We're getting there :-)
Please remove the files in
build/pkgs/pynac/patches/
and run make again.
I worked on Sage 8.9.rc0 which has a newer pynac, sorry.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:45 PM Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> I tried to run ./configure before running make now, and I get this new error:
>
I tried to run ./configure before running make now, and I get this new
error:
sage-logger -p 'sage-spkg pynac-0.7.26.p1'
'/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/logs/pkgs/pynac-0.7.26.p1.log'
[pynac-0.7.26.p1] Found local metadata for pynac-0.7.26.p1
[pynac-0.7.26.p1] Using cached file
/scratch/mc1903/sag
make[1]: Entering directory `/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/build/make'
sage-logger -p 'sage-spkg pynac-0.7.24.p0'
'/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/logs/pkgs/pynac-0.7.24.p0.log'
[pynac-0.7.24.p0] Attempting to download package pynac-0.7.24.p0
[pynac-0.7.24.p0] >>> Checking online list of optional packa
hmm.
Try running
./sage -f pynac
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:36 PM Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> It's 0.7.26.p1 .
>
> On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:32:39 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> what is the content of build/pkgs/pynac/package-version.txt ?
>> (i.e. SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/pynac
It's 0.7.26.p1 .
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 9:32:39 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> what is the content of build/pkgs/pynac/package-version.txt ?
> (i.e. SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/pynac/package-version.txt)
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:31 PM Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Se
what is the content of build/pkgs/pynac/package-version.txt ?
(i.e. SAGE_ROOT/build/pkgs/pynac/package-version.txt)
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:31 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:25 PM Marco Castronovo
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Dima,
> >
> > thank you for the help. I followed th
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:25 PM Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> Dear Dima,
>
> thank you for the help. I followed the instructions and I get:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory `/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/build/make'
>
> sage-logger -p 'sage-spkg pynac-0.7.24.p0'
> '/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/logs/pkgs/pyn
Dear Dima,
thank you for the help. I followed the instructions and I get:
make[3]: Entering directory `/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/build/make'
sage-logger -p 'sage-spkg pynac-0.7.24.p0'
'/scratch/mc1903/sage-8.8/logs/pkgs/pynac-0.7.24.p0.log'
[pynac-0.7.24.p0] Attempting to download package pyna
Is it really "expected" that clocks are off by a second?!
hal0001: Wed Sep 18 00:15:29 EDT 2019
hal0002: Wed Sep 18 00:15:28 EDT 2019
Perhaps Francois may tell...
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 2:14 PM Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> I contacted the administrators of the cluster asking about possible issu
I contacted the administrators of the cluster asking about possible issues
with timestamps. The answer is:
Hello,
I am happy to report there are no timestamps issues on the Amarel cluster
at this time.
Our nodes utilize a ntp client that maintains synchronization with a
central time source.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:14 PM Thierry wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems to me that Python 3 migration should not only be a syntax
> adaptation (like print('blah')), unicode, or the mitigation of issues
> related to the fact that different objects are not always comparable.
>
> It should also take into
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:59 AM Matthias Goerner wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 2:11:59 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> The error in sagenb building is an indication that there was an error
>> earlier on.
>>
>> What does happen if you try starting Sage by doing
>>
>>
On Wednesday, September 18, 2019 at 2:11:59 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> The error in sagenb building is an indication that there was an error
> earlier on.
>
> What does happen if you try starting Sage by doing
>
> ./sage
>
> ?
>
Crash, see attached report.
>
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:44 AM E. Madison Bray
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 8:11 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > The error in sagenb building is an indication that there was an error
> > > earlier on.
> > >
> > > Wha
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:44 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 8:11 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > The error in sagenb building is an indication that there was an error
> > earlier on.
> >
> > What does happen if you try starting Sage by doing
> >
> > ./sage
> >
> > ?
>
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 8:11 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> The error in sagenb building is an indication that there was an error earlier
> on.
>
> What does happen if you try starting Sage by doing
>
> ./sage
>
> ?
This seems to be happening often enough when there are build issues
(and thus ob
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 1:08 AM Marco Castronovo
wrote:
>
> Sure I'm happy to try the new tarball. Thanks!
Please follow the instructions on
https://github.com/dimpase/pynac/releases/tag/am_mainta
(and let us know whether this at least helped to fix the pynac build -
assuming you keep my previou
The situation will be improved after
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27873
for curves over finite fields.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-d
Hello,
the function:
divisor_of_function(r)
which should return the divisor of a function on a curve does not work up
to now. On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this function is marked as* "to do"*.
Is it likely that this featu
Hello,
the function
divisor_of_function(*r*)
that should return the divisor of a function on a curve doesn't work.
On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this is marked as *"to do"*. Is it likely that this feature will be
implemen
Hello,
the function:
divisor_of_function(r)
which should return the divisor of a function on a curve does not work up
to now. On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this function is marked as* "to do"*.
Is it likely that this featu
Hello,
the function:
divisor_of_function(r)
which should return the divisor of a function on a curve does not work up
to now. On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this function is marked as* "to do"*.
Is it likely that this featu
Hello,
the function
divisor_of_function(*r*)
that should return the divisor of a function on a curve doesn't work.
On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this is marked as *"to do"*. Is it likely that this feature will be
implemen
Hello,
the function:
divisor_of_function(r)
which should return the divisor of a function on a curve does not work up
to now. On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this function is marked as* "to do"*.
Is it likely that this featu
Hello,
the function:
divisor_of_function(r)
which should return the divisor of a function on a curve does not work up
to now. On the page
http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/reference/curves/sage/schemes/curves/affine_curve.html
this function is marked as* "to do"*.
Is it likely that this featu
I can make an account on the buildbot worker, send me the name and ssh
public key (I don't have Isuru's email address)
On Sunday, September 15, 2019 at 10:47:58 PM UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> Can anyone give Isuru Fernando access to a macOS computer so
> he can debu
33 matches
Mail list logo
