Dear sage-devel,
This blog post on continuous benchmarking looks interesting!
https://medium.com/@wolfv/building-an-open-source-continuous-benchmark-system-717839093962
There have been related discussions on this list in the past,
for example around airspeed velocity:
https://groups.google.com/
On 5/30/19 12:06 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> I'm guessing that when you run "sh configure", it runs some other "sh"
> from one of those Sage directories, and not /bin/sh.
>
> Running "command -v sh" should tell you which "sh" is running, in case
> that helps.
>
Yeah, nevermind... th
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 5:52:26 PM UTC-7, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On 5/28/19 5:09 PM, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> >
> > $ cd
> /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5/src
> > $ strace sh congiure
> > ...
> > 4000 lines in total including:
> > ...
> > facces
On 5/28/19 5:09 PM, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> $ cd /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/pynormaliz-2.5/src
> $ strace sh congiure
> ...
> 4000 lines in total including:
> ...
> faccessat(AT_FDCWD, "/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/configure", R_OK) = 0
> stat("/home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/config
I hope this is not too far off-topic, but it is something that is
definitely relevant to the Sage development community.
The 12th Conference on Intelligent Computer Mathematics, CICM 2019, is July
8-12, 2019 in Prague, Czech Republic. The conference will be located at the
Czech Institute of Inf
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 10:17:08 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> dash is a bit of a problem. I am not sure whether currently it is
> possible to build Sage with sh==dash
>
Well, I have been using this setup for more than 2 years now with no
problem in compiling Sage hundreds of time
Hi Simon,
On 2019-05-27, Simon Brandhorst wrote:
> I would agree that I want unique representation with simple "ambient"
> objects (usually constructed from an integer and maybe a ring). Then with
> complicated objects I am not so sure anymore. Say subgroups of a group and
> submodules of a mo
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:16 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> dash is a bit of a problem. I am not sure whether currently it is
> possible to build Sage with sh==dash
hmm, scratch this. it works at least on Debian stable.
> Perhaps modifying pynormaliz to actually use bash for building might
> solv
assembly errors - means either broken toolchain (old `as` picked up ?), or
a failure to detect the correct architecture...
I guess sysadmins of this system see such errors every day, given how messy
that setup is.
On Wed, 29 May 2019 08:08 Christian Stump,
wrote:
> Okay, thank you for checking
dash is a bit of a problem. I am not sure whether currently it is
possible to build Sage with sh==dash
Perhaps modifying pynormaliz to actually use bash for building might
solve this.
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 9:15 AM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 8:53:37 AM UTC+2, Sa
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 2:12 AM Colby Kelln wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm receiving a similar error message. What exactly did you do to fix the
> problem?
it depends - try starting sage, and post the error message (and
probably the relevant logs, too) here.
I wonder whether changing the way sagenb dep
On Wednesday, May 29, 2019 at 8:53:37 AM UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Tue 2019-05-28 23:09:33 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé:
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 1:40:45 PM UTC+2, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> First, can you find out where /bin/sh actually points?
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I do not kn
12 matches
Mail list logo
