On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:25 AM Ike Stoddard wrote:
>
> 1) I have installed atlas-lapack-base as blas/lapack for a number of packages
> already.
> 2) sagemath tries to install its own blas/lapack (openblas)
> 3) is there a way to configure sagemath to use this library instead?
you can set SAGE_A
Dear all,
PartitionsGreatestEQ(n, k) returns the set of integer partitions of n with
maximal part equal to k. Do we want that PartitionsGreatestEQ(0, 3) has
cardinality 1, containing the empty partition?
This is at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27331
Martin
--
You received this message b
1) I have installed atlas-lapack-base as blas/lapack for a number of
packages already.
2) sagemath tries to install its own blas/lapack (openblas)
3) is there a way to configure sagemath to use this library instead?
Otherwise I am in uninstall/reinstall hell.
pacman -S sagemath
resolving depende
Yes and that does work.
> On 21/02/2019, at 17:19, Ike Stoddard wrote:
>
> But without sage installed, it just uses the “local” script ./sage to do the
> 1-shot?
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 22:16 François Bissey wrote:
> TO some extent, configure would have to be run first if you starting fro
But without sage installed, it just uses the “local” script ./sage to do
the 1-shot?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 22:16 François Bissey wrote:
> TO some extent, configure would have to be run first if you starting from
> scratch.
> But I was thinking of the following sequence.
> * build normally with
TO some extent, configure would have to be run first if you starting from
scratch.
But I was thinking of the following sequence.
* build normally with SPKG_CHECK
* build breaks at linbox.
* Do a one shot install of linbox
* resume build with make until the next issue.
> On 21/02/2019, at 17:13, I
But will this work without a prior installation?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 19:00 François Bissey wrote:
> ./sage -i linbox
>
> > On 21/02/2019, at 13:51, Ike Stoddard
> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, I cannot see how to do that. How do I install a one-shot?
> > In the unpacked linbox subtree: spkg
./sage -i linbox
> On 21/02/2019, at 13:51, Ike Stoddard wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I cannot see how to do that. How do I install a one-shot?
> In the unpacked linbox subtree: spkg-install? src/linbox-auto-install?
>
> On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 1:51:33 PM UTC-6, François Bissey wrote:
Unfortunately, I cannot see how to do that. How do I install a one-shot?
In the unpacked linbox subtree: spkg-install? src/linbox-auto-install?
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 1:51:33 PM UTC-6, François Bissey wrote:
>
> sage is not yet able to use a system installed linbox.
> You could insta
Yes from the log it seems like there is an issue between openCL and C++11.
linbox uses an older macro for c++11 detection so the standard flag is not
added. I honestly think it may be an upstream bug in the testing code.
> On 21/02/2019, at 08:45, Ike Stoddard wrote:
>
> Yep. Wanted to check sub
sage is not yet able to use a system installed linbox.
You could install linbox as a one shot without testing with
sage and resume make.
> On 21/02/2019, at 08:49, Ike Stoddard wrote:
>
> There is a native linbox I can install. Will do so and reconfigure. Is there
> a way to use the stuff compi
There is a native linbox I can install. Will do so and reconfigure. Is
there a way to use the stuff compiled to that point, or do I have to start
again?
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, 13:24 Dima Pasechnik You are running with SAGE_CHECK=yes, isn't it?
> Anyhow, I don't think anyone tried OpenCL with Sage'
Yep. Wanted to check subsystems before putting package together.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019, 13:24 Dima Pasechnik You are running with SAGE_CHECK=yes, isn't it?
> Anyhow, I don't think anyone tried OpenCL with Sage's linbox...
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:26 PM Ike Stoddard
> wrote:
> >
> > test-open
You are running with SAGE_CHECK=yes, isn't it?
Anyhow, I don't think anyone tried OpenCL with Sage's linbox...
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:26 PM Ike Stoddard wrote:
>
> test-opencl-domain failed to compile. Log is attached.
>
>
> Host system:
> L
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 6:41 PM Thierry wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 04:07:07PM +0100, E. Madison Bray wrote:
> [...]
> > Fixing that's something I've been working toward for practically as
> > long as I've been working on the project, and we've been making real
> > progress lately,
Dear Sage people,
we have an opportunity to organize some Sage Days in Nigeria (university of
Ibadan). These would be targeted mostly at local people of the university
of Ibadan and other Nigerian universities. We have a local contact who is
in charge of all the practical aspects.
We are looking
> >
> > I think we really should look into using Homebrew for building on OSX,
> > otherwise we are doomed to repeat what's done there...
>
> Personally I would suggest not developing software that isn't built
> for Apple products with Apple's toolchain on an Apple OS, because
> Apple is inc
+1
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:14 Vincent Klein, wrote:
> In ticket #23024 we made pplpy and independant package with gmpy2 as
> return types.
>
> As opinion for having pplpy returning Sage's type has also been expressed,
> the goal of this message is to check
> if we globally agree to pass pplpy and
In ticket #23024 we made pplpy and independant package with gmpy2 as return
types.
As opinion for having pplpy returning Sage's type has also been expressed,
the goal of this message is to check
if we globally agree to pass pplpy and gmpy2 as standard packages.
Vincent K.
--
You received thi
I just realised that `Compositions` and `IntegerListLex` do not seem to
support generation of lists whose entries are in a specified set. I admit
that I'm not sure it would be worth it.
Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To
20 matches
Mail list logo
