Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

2019-01-28 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:21 AM kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> I just want to mention that sagenb 1.1.0 comes with docs installed in >> SAGE_LOCAL/share... >> so there is no regression - except I have no idea how to properly l

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Remove sagenb documentation from the reference manual?

2019-01-28 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I just want to mention that sagenb 1.1.0 comes with docs installed in > SAGE_LOCAL/share... > so there is no regression - except I have no idea how to properly link it > from Sage's docs. > > So I just ran into this now

Re: [sage-devel] Re: python3 status report

2019-01-28 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 2:55 PM Simon King wrote: > > Hi Frédéric, > > On 2019-01-27, Frédéric Chapoton wrote: > > I am pretty sure you would be rather happy working only with python3. > > That's too early. For teaching, I need to know that I have a working > Sage installation, and for research I

[sage-devel] Re: one patchbot misconfigured

2019-01-28 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
and to all patchbot breeders : please also *install* *pycodestyle*, so that maybe I will no longer have to fix invalid escape sequences newly introduced at every release. F Le dimanche 27 janvier 2019 20:19:25 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit : > > So this patchbot belongs to nobody ? Too bad.