Hi again, thanks to both of you.
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 11:52:25 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> pacman -S gcc-fortran
>
> and try again
>
Circumventing this step made complete the build, thank you very much.
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 12:18:45 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:
Sure, Thank you!
On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 21:07:39 UTC+5:30, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 3:31 PM Durgesh Agrawal
> > wrote:
> >
> > Yes, it seems sensible to me too! Should I send another patch?
>
> Please do, but instead of "sending a patch" the work is less likely t
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 3:31 PM Durgesh Agrawal
wrote:
>
> Yes, it seems sensible to me too! Should I send another patch?
Please do, but instead of "sending a patch" the work is less likely to
languish if you push a branch to git, and update the branch field of
the ticket to your branch; please se
Hi!
In the past I intensely used pexpect interfaces to GAP and even more to
Singular. Recently I switched to using libgap, which turned out to be a
good idea. Now I consider to replace "singular-via-pexpect" by
libsingular. But I got stuck very early.
Setting: I am dealing with graded-homogeneous
Yes, it seems sensible to me too! Should I send another patch?
On Wednesday, 2 January 2019 19:59:08 UTC+5:30, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:11 PM Durgesh Agrawal
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> > I wish to work on #12908. There has been a discussion in the thread but
> no c
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:11 PM Durgesh Agrawal
wrote:
>
> Hello!
> I wish to work on #12908. There has been a discussion in the thread but no
> conclusion seems to have been arrived at. I have checked and the issue is
> still there in the recent version of Sage. Can I work on the ticket, or is i
Hello!
I wish to work on #12908. There has been a discussion in the thread but no
conclusion seems to have been arrived at. I have checked and the issue is
still there in the recent version of Sage. Can I work on the ticket, or is
it invalid?
--
You received this message because you are subsc
This is now https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26996
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group,
Most probably one is the reverse of the other.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:49 PM Jori Mäntysalo (TAU)
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
>
> > I thought that the definition of the canonical labels was the
> > order on vertices that minimize the adjacency matrix in
> > lexicogra
The first thing to try would be to install gfortran on the system -
most probably you don't need to build a copy of gfortran from source
(this is a measure of last resort...):
That is, do (perhaps with sudo?)
pacman -S gcc-fortran
and try again
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 6:41 PM Sverre Lunøe-Nielse
Hello,
I just cloned the GIT repository and tried to build version 8.5 on a fresh
Manjaro 18.0 installation. I got the following error:
> [...]
>
66509-real 31m50.729s
>
66510-user 28m47.266s
> 66511-sys 2m43.839s
> 66512-Copying package files from temporary location
> /home
On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 7:25:30 AM UTC+1, François Bissey wrote:
>
> We already have seen it in 8.5.beta but no one has opened a ticket yet for
> it
> I think. Nor does anyone knows the real trigger for it.
> Because I first spotted it in sage-on-gentoo I thought that it was a
> sqli
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> I thought that the definition of the canonical labels was the
> order on vertices that minimize the adjacency matrix in
> lexicographic order...
?? Any function that translates isomorphism to equality is a canonical
labeling.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
Ta
13 matches
Mail list logo
