On Saturday, 15 December 2018 22:22:09 UTC+1, parisse wrote:
>
>
>
> Le samedi 15 décembre 2018 20:57:02 UTC+1, Bill Hart a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> And even if giac did all that, it is one of many projects doing
>> multivariate polynomial arithmetic in Europe. There's also Trip, Piranha,
>> Factory
Le samedi 15 décembre 2018 20:57:02 UTC+1, Bill Hart a écrit :
>
>
>
> And even if giac did all that, it is one of many projects doing
> multivariate polynomial arithmetic in Europe. There's also Trip, Piranha,
> Factory, Pari/GP, Gap. I really don't think it is a valid argument that
> just be
On Saturday, 15 December 2018 18:19:53 UTC+1, parisse wrote:
>
> Bill, my feeling is that part of ODK money was used to improve
> multivariate polynomial arithmetic implementations precisely in a domain
> where Giac behaves well (and maybe I should emphasize that unlike almost
> all other CAS,
That sounds great!
David
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:28 AM John Cremona wrote:
> +1
>
> On 15 Dec 2018 10:09, "Dima Pasechnik" wrote:
>
>> The present design with two optional packages gap_packages and
>> database_gap was dictated in the 1st place by copyright issues with
>> their contents, preve
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 6:25 PM Thierry wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 5:37 PM Thierry
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this question is related to the thread about Groebner bases.
> > >
> > > Are there some free-softw
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 05:58:57PM +, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 5:37 PM Thierry
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this question is related to the thread about Groebner bases.
> >
> > Are there some free-software implementations for real algebraic geometry
> > available somewh
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 5:37 PM Thierry wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this question is related to the thread about Groebner bases.
>
> Are there some free-software implementations for real algebraic geometry
> available somewhere ? Could Giac or Singular help with that ? Or maybe
> Reduce or Macaulay2 (that
Hi,
this question is related to the thread about Groebner bases.
Are there some free-software implementations for real algebraic geometry
available somewhere ? Could Giac or Singular help with that ? Or maybe
Reduce or Macaulay2 (that are not shipped with Sage) ?
More precisely, suppose i have a
Bill, my feeling is that part of ODK money was used to improve multivariate
polynomial arithmetic implementations precisely in a domain where Giac
behaves well (and maybe I should emphasize that unlike almost all other
CAS, Giac is a library, i.e. is interoperable with any software that can
int
On Saturday, 15 December 2018 17:10:10 UTC+1, Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, 9 December 2018 11:22:48 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> I cannot comment on why certain implementations did not use Giac code,
>> I am not involved in this work.
>>
>
> I am involved in that,
>
I should pr
On Sunday, 9 December 2018 11:22:48 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I cannot comment on why certain implementations did not use Giac code,
> I am not involved in this work.
>
I am involved in that, but I believe there may be some misconceptions here.
The implementations we are doing for ODK a
I have opened #26902: convert all of Sage library code to libgap.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post
On Friday, 7 December 2018 21:41:41 UTC+1, Markus Wageringel wrote:
>
> Am Freitag, 7. Dezember 2018 13:07:45 UTC+1 schrieb Bill Hart:
>>
>> How many physical cores do you have on the machine (not logical cores),
>> and how many CPU sockets and what is the cache structure? (I assume it is
>> at
+1
On 15 Dec 2018 10:09, "Dima Pasechnik" wrote:
> The present design with two optional packages gap_packages and
> database_gap was dictated in the 1st place by copyright issues with
> their contents, preventing them from being standard.
>
> Since GAP release 4.9, all these issues have been res
The present design with two optional packages gap_packages and
database_gap was dictated in the 1st place by copyright issues with
their contents, preventing them from being standard.
Since GAP release 4.9, all these issues have been resolved upstream,
and I propose these spkgs to be merged into t
this does not look like a Sage issue, rather like an texmacs issue.
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 3:26 AM Amir Zia wrote:
>
> I have another problem with texmacs:
>
> I open multiple documents and then: When the document is saved and then
> closed, I do not get this warning...When the document is unsa
16 matches
Mail list logo
