Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

2018-11-16 Thread Luca De Feo
> I guess that 50 simultaneous connection will be the maximum. The use might > be, for example, a course on graph theory having mandatory but trivial > exercise about SageMath graph functions. That's a reasonable load. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

2018-11-16 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018, Luca De Feo wrote: and maybe 10 of them will be heavy duty users. Then maybe 500 may be users in some random course, or checking just one computation etc. 500 hundred simultaneous connections may also be a bit too much, depending on how powerful your server is. I guess t

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

2018-11-16 Thread Luca De Feo
> How fast will new SageMath versions be packaged? I suppose that fast > enought, and those needing the bleeding edge version can compile it > themself. I agree. Ubuntu bionic has 8.1, cosmic has 8.3. Unless we screw up and make Sage impossible to package (see mail by Samuel on Debian freeze), th

[sage-devel] Re: NTL 11.3.2

2018-11-16 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Le vendredi 16 novembre 2018 02:44:17 UTC+1, Victor Shoup a écrit : > > I just uploaded NTL 11.3.2 to https://www.shoup.net/ntl/ > > This fixes a performance issue in the ZZ PowerMod function (which also > affects the prime testing and generating function). > The upgrade in Sage is tracked at h

Re: [sage-devel] Jupyterhub kernel and SAGE_ROOT

2018-11-16 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Luca De Feo wrote: Packagers have already solved it for various distributions, so, if you don't need a Sage version compiled from sources, you can have a working Sage + JupyterHub setup using the system packages with no further hacks. How fast will new SageMath versions be