Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can't compile 8.4.beta3

2018-09-10 Thread Andrew
Dear John and Erik, Thanks for the hints. I have tried recompiling several times as suggested but the build still fails, sometimes on pip-18.0 and sometimes on python3-3.6.6.p0. Given the potential race condition in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18438 I'll try compiling with a single core a

Re: [sage-devel] QQ not isomorphic to itself?!

2018-09-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-09-10 21:36, John Cremona wrote: The bug is because of this: Since you almost fixed this bug, could you actually create a ticket to fix it? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv

[sage-devel] QQ not isomorphic to itself?!

2018-09-10 Thread John Cremona
sage: Qx = PolynomialRing(QQ,'x') sage: F1 = NumberField(Qx([0,1]),'a1'); F1 Number Field in a1 with defining polynomial x sage: F2 = NumberField(Qx([0,1]),'a2'); F2 Number Field in a2 with defining polynomial x sage: F1.is_isomorphic(F2) False The bug is because of this: sage: f1=F1.pari_polynom

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can't compile 8.4.beta3

2018-09-10 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 6:33 AM John H Palmieri wrote: > > One thing to try, in case you haven't already: run make once, and if it fails > with a warning like this, try running make again immediately (without doing > "make distclean"). (Sage may be using Sage's python in the installation > proc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?

2018-09-10 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
On Monday, September 10, 2018 at 2:34:06 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:43 PM 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel > > wrote: > > > > NTL is your best best. However zn_poly is a tour de force. It would be > hard to beat. > IIRC it's very hardcoded into hypellfrob (http://web

Re: [sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?

2018-09-10 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 1:43 PM 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel wrote: > > NTL is your best best. However zn_poly is a tour de force. It would be hard > to beat. If nothing else, I am making it easier to maintain now, so if someone wants to hack on it it will be easier to do so now and has an "offici

[sage-devel] Re: zn_poly status?

2018-09-10 Thread 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
NTL is your best best. However zn_poly is a tour de force. It would be hard to beat. On Friday, 7 September 2018 19:13:32 UTC+2, Antonio Rojas wrote: > > > > El viernes, 7 de septiembre de 2018, 15:53:43 (UTC+2), Erik Bray escribió: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Does anyone know what that current status i