El viernes, 7 de septiembre de 2018, 15:53:43 (UTC+2), Erik Bray escribió:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly
> package? According to its website
> http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained",
> though it has been re-rel
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:59 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Great! Please let us know on sage-packaging once you put out a new release
> and switch sage over.
Yes, definitely. I will also update the relevant SPKG.txt.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
Great! Please let us know on sage-packaging once you put out a new release
and switch sage over.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubs
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 4:13 PM David Roe wrote:
>
> I've CCed David Harvey, but I think that creating a github repo for it sounds
> great.
> David
Thanks! Pending some response from David Harvey, I've just gone ahead
and done it:
https://gitlab.com/sagemath/zn_poly
All previous releases of zn
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 6:27 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
>
>
> Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 17:56:04 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>> >
>> > For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at
>> > least the sage doctests pass
Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 17:56:04 UTC+2 schrieb Erik Bray:
>
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Timo Kaufmann > wrote:
> >
> > For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at
> least the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice
> though. And si
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:29 PM Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at least
> the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice though.
> And since upstream is officially dead, I think giving it a new home would be
> very
For what its worth, we currently don't apply any patches in nix and at
least the sage doctests pass. A more standard build would still be nice
though. And since upstream is officially dead, I think giving it a new
home would be very good. +1 from me.
Am Freitag, 7. September 2018 15:53:43 UTC+
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 5:04 AM, Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> A tentative "status of Sage packaging and distribution" posted on the
> sage-packaging mailing list is resulting in an interesting discussion at:
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-packaging/ZJmJZi1Tawo/discussio
gitlab sounds even better :-)
Le 07/09/2018 à 10:13, David Roe a écrit :
I've CCed David Harvey, but I think that creating a github repo for it
sounds great.
David
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Erik Bray wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly
pa
I've CCed David Harvey, but I think that creating a github repo for it
sounds great.
David
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 9:53 AM Erik Bray wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly
> package? According to its website
> http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly
Hi all,
Does anyone know what that current status is of the upstream zn_poly
package? According to its website
http://cims.nyu.edu/~harvey/zn_poly/ it is "no longer maintained",
though it has been re-released under a BSD-compatible license.
Since its last upstream release the package for it in S
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 11:40 AM David Coudert wrote:
>
> Comparisons like u < v are used in many places in the code of graphs.
> We can try to use hash(u) < hash(v) instead, but this is certainly not the
> smartest solution.
I have a long-outstanding proposal for a SafeSortable utility that
woul
Dear sage-devel,
A tentative "status of Sage packaging and distribution" posted on the
sage-packaging mailing list is resulting in an interesting discussion at:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-packaging/ZJmJZi1Tawo/discussion
Pointing to it here so that anybody interested in the subject c
14 matches
Mail list logo
