Le Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:52:07 +0200,
Erik Bray a écrit :
> > As a simple workaround, you could try for now building with
> > --enable-fat for MPIR, which builds a more machine-generic MPIR by
> > running:
> >
> > SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes ./sage -f mpir
> >
> > Then, once MPIR has been re-built, ru
Hi!
On 2018-07-20, aishen wrote:
> the 24 input :X_SD_IV. = M_IV.chart(r't r:(0,2*m)
> th:(0,pi):\theta ph:(0,2*pi):\phi')
> X_SD_IV
It looks very obscure and is certainly nothing that could be executed in
any version of SageMath (neither in command line nor in the notebook).
So, could you ple
Hi,
I don't remenber if it's in this mailing list for SM , if not sorry :)
the 24 input :X_SD_IV. = M_IV.chart(r't r:(0,2*m)
th:(0,pi):\theta ph:(0,2*pi):\phi')
X_SD_IV
gives me this error ?
ValueError: Assumption is inconsistent
I am with sagemath 8.3 rc1 and I just noticed I can use 8.2 and
I just did a fresh install of sagemath (git clone …) and the starting
banner is weird. I don’t know if it’s due to my system (recent update to
fedora 28) or to recent changes in Sagemath.
Any help to solve the issue is more than welcome ;)
David.
==
musclotte:/home/dcoudert/sage> uname -a
Li
Ahem...
Le jeudi 19 juillet 2018 01:20:28 UTC+2, Volker Braun a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
The same people that wish for a rigid schedule now will complain later
> that they missed the merge window by a day ;-)
>
Hmmm... Bayesian suggestion : make the schedule dates random variables and
publish th
