[sage-devel] Re: Why my patch is not yet accepted?

2018-05-22 Thread Ralf Stephan
There are currently 250 tickets needing review (20 from me), and it all depends on people volunteering as reviewers, so the reason is very probably that none of them is interested enough in your ticket, at the moment. Regards, -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog

Re: [sage-devel] executable referenced in sagemath jupyter kernel

2018-05-22 Thread François Bissey
> On 23/05/2018, at 10:27, François Bissey wrote: > > > >> On 23/05/2018, at 10:02, Nils Bruin wrote: >> >> On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 12:08:22 AM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote: >> >> >> OK, so how do we see whether the $SAGE_ROOT/sage script needs to be used? >> Can we just see if $SAGE

Re: [sage-devel] Re: executable referenced in sagemath jupyter kernel

2018-05-22 Thread François Bissey
> On 23/05/2018, at 10:02, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 12:08:22 AM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote: > > > OK, so how do we see whether the $SAGE_ROOT/sage script needs to be used? > Can we just see if $SAGE_ROOT/sage is present and executable and if not, use > $SAGE_LOCAL

[sage-devel] Why my patch is not yet accepted?

2018-05-22 Thread Victor Porton
I committed a new feature of Sage 4 months ago. It is now needs_review. Why is it not yet accepted? Is something wrong? Or should I just wait more? https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24542 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubsc

[sage-devel] Cloning Sage git hangs

2018-05-22 Thread Victor Porton
Cloning Sage hangs on 99%: build,0$ git clone git://git.sagemath.org/sage.git Cloning into 'sage'... remote: Counting objects: 684626, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (110335/110335), done. Receiving objects: 99% (677780/684626), 202.90 MiB | 2.24 MiB/s My computer has 8GB and swap. The

Re: [sage-devel] Re: executable referenced in sagemath jupyter kernel

2018-05-22 Thread Nils Bruin
On Saturday, May 19, 2018 at 12:08:22 AM UTC-7, Antonio Rojas wrote: > > > >> OK, so how do we see whether the $SAGE_ROOT/sage script needs to be >> used? Can we just see if $SAGE_ROOT/sage is present and executable and if >> not, use $SAGE_LOCAL/bin/sage? The remark by François seems quite to t

Re: [sage-devel] Getting a code signing certificate for Sage

2018-05-22 Thread William Stein
It would of course be natural for Sage Foundation to do this. Write to me off list. On Tue, May 22, 2018, 7:19 AM Erik Bray wrote: > I would like to be able to sign future versions of the Sage for > Windows installer. Not only does it just *look* more professional > (users don't get a "Installi

[sage-devel] Getting a code signing certificate for Sage

2018-05-22 Thread Erik Bray
I would like to be able to sign future versions of the Sage for Windows installer. Not only does it just *look* more professional (users don't get a "Installing software from an unknown provider" message when they install Sage), it also protects are users from bogus or tampered with copies of the