On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 3:31:25 AM UTC-6, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Ralf Stephan > wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Is deprecation necessary for class member functions starting with
> > underscore, i.e. a weak "internal use" indicator?
>
> I don't know what the precedent
For generating books mixing LaTeX and computation cells,
see also PreTeXt:
http://mathbook.pugetsound.edu/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to s
Dear Daniel,
Le vendredi 19 janvier 2018 21:05:59 UTC+1, danielv...@yahoo.es a écrit :
>
> Since I was the originator of this request I would like to explain myself.
>>
>
> I'm new to SageMath, but I have been using WxMaxima for quite a while now.
>
Which is indeed a good notebook (if a bit insul
>
> Since I was the originator of this request I would like to explain myself.
>
I'm new to SageMath, but I have been using WxMaxima for quite a while now.
I would like to have some way to define Sections and Subsections in a
SageMath notebook, but the definitions should not be static, i.e. if
To my mind, (ZZ^2).span([[1/2,0]]) should not even work...
On 19 January 2018 at 09:59, Simon Brandhorst wrote:
>
>
> On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 9:16:16 AM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
>>
>> I think that it should be False in both situations. "is_submodule"
>> should only be used in the context w
On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 10:28:55 AM UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > I think it does matter for the user: in EXAMPLES one should put examples
> > useful for the user, and G.show() is more flexible, e.g. one can do
> > G.show(method="js") t
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I think it does matter for the user: in EXAMPLES one should put examples
useful for the user, and G.show() is more flexible, e.g. one can do
G.show(method="js") to show G in the browser.
True, but is it meaningfull to say for most graphs that this-a
On Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 11:24:56 PM UTC, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
>
> > I don't think plot, unlike show, actually goes through and does the
>> > rendering of the image and discards the result. However, I could be
>> > wrong about this.
>>
>> You were right. After
>>
>> perl -e 's/(G
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Hi,
> Is deprecation necessary for class member functions starting with
> underscore, i.e. a weak "internal use" indicator?
I don't know what the precedent is for Sage, but I would say no.
There are rare cases that an undescored member is act
On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 9:16:16 AM UTC+1, vdelecroix wrote:
> I think that it should be False in both situations. "is_submodule"
> should only be used in the context where we have an ambient free
> module, like ZZ^d and two ZZ-submodules U and V.
>
I disagree - the question makes perfe
Maybe the question then splits into two parts:
1) Is ZZ^2 a subset of CC^2 ? (Use this for __richcmp__)
2) Is ZZ^2 a submodule of CC^2 in the category of modules over ZZ? That is
do we view CC^2 as a ZZ-module?
(It is a ZZ-module in a natural way by the inclusion ZZ ---> CC) So
basically shou
Hi,
Is deprecation necessary for class member functions starting with
underscore, i.e. a weak "internal use" indicator?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an emai
Dear Simon,
I think that it should be False in both situations. "is_submodule"
should only be used in the context where we have an ambient free
module, like ZZ^d and two ZZ-submodules U and V. In particular, this
situation implies that U and V are defined over the same base ring.
And even more U.a
13 matches
Mail list logo
