I think that printing the result of bool(effective_result==expected_result)
is sufficient for testing purposes, and has the advantage of testing
mathematical equality, not only string equality.
You may want to be more explicit when failing : you may try (something
like) :
res=bool(effective_re
On 12/12/2017 09:30 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> Another workaround that's so obvious I smacked myself on the head is
> that for many cases, particularly objects that have a small dict in
> their representation, is to simply change the __repr__ so that its
> dict is always displayed sorted. If the or
On Tuesday, 12 December 2017 15:30:39 UTC+1, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Erik Bray > wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Michael Orlitzky > wrote:
> >> On 12/06/2017 09:49 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Did anyone ever think up a better solution to this?
I did a make in ~/sage-8.1. When that completes I cd to src/Mac-app and
run make again.
My version of Mac OS is 10.13.2.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
How did you start the building of Sage app?
One just changes to src/mac-app and starts make
This at least works with Sage 8.1 for me on OSX 10.12.6 and Xcode 9.2.
On Sunday, December 10, 2017 at 9:23:11 PM UTC, Michael Frey wrote:
>
> I double checked and the Xcode IDE and Xcode Command Line T
there is a conflict with your Anaconda installation. Make sure it not in your
PATH.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googleg
Hi there!
I need help for this install error of Sage 8.1.
It seems that the culprit is "libcurl >= 7.22.0 library not found by the
compiler".
Xcode 9.2 installed along with its command line tools version 9.2 for MacOS
10.13.2.
Best wishes!
S.Diop
Last lines of the build log
[r-3.4.2.p0] checkin
I have an issue with sage-8.1 (also with 8.0). This is my code:
R.=PolynomialRing(QQ,order='neglex')
f=(y^2-x^3)*(y^2-x^2*y-x^3)
singular.lib("all.lib")
f._singular_().bernstein().sage()
f._singular_().bfct().sage()
The two last functions are two different algorithms in order to compute
Bernstei
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Michael Orlitzky
> wrote:
>> On 12/06/2017 09:49 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
>>>
>>> Did anyone ever think up a better solution to this?
>>>
>>
>> Whatever you do, you wind up with a big pile of dict output in the
>> m
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2017-12-11 18:35, Simon King wrote:
>>
>> Well, we want to mix in P.category().element_class (an abstract class)
>> into whatever P prescribes for its elements. So, P.element_class
>> should be a class whose mro also contains abstract ele
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Have you tested against a real LDAP server?
Yes. It works.
Could you comment on https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/issues/177
rather than here?
OK, I'll continue there.
--
Jori Mäntysalo
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 8:02:36 AM UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > why would you bother with easy_install at all? All these packages you
> need
> > are installable with pip.
> >
> > I am now trying to summarise what you did
> > here:
On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 8:02:36 AM UTC, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > why would you bother with easy_install at all? All these packages you
> need
> > are installable with pip.
> >
> > I am now trying to summarise what you did
> > here:
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
why would you bother with easy_install at all? All these packages you need
are installable with pip.
I am now trying to summarise what you did
here: https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/issues/177
Please have a look and check.
I do not know if "./sage
14 matches
Mail list logo
