Thank you. I missed that in the examples. Is there documentation listing
all Manifold.options? I cannot find one with the documentation search.
On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 3:40:41 PM UTC-8, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> Le samedi 18 novembre 2017 23:55:35 UTC+1, Richard_L a écrit :
>
On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 5:52:13 PM UTC-5, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> The conclusion from Erik Bray's issue report seems to be that if a user
> posts an answers containing a url but this user's karma is less than the
> threshold to post links, then the answer is blocked from being submit
HI,
Le samedi 18 novembre 2017 23:55:35 UTC+1, Richard_L a écrit :
>
> Applying ExpressionNice() to an expression containing partial derivatives
> cleans up the presentation, suppressing the display of function arguments
> in the partial derivatives. However, zeroth order derivatives (i.e., the
Applying ExpressionNice() to an expression containing partial derivatives
cleans up the presentation, suppressing the display of function arguments
in the partial derivatives. However, zeroth order derivatives (i.e., the
function alone) are not cleaned up.
I think it would be useful to extend t
The conclusion from Erik Bray's issue report seems to be that if a user
posts an answers containing a url but this user's karma is less than the
threshold to post links, then the answer is blocked from being submitted.
Instead, shouldn't it be added to the moderation queue? Or would that
make the m
I've made #24085 a blocker, as people reporting the same issue on 8.1.rc2.
Could please people suffering from this bug please test
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24085 and say here or on the ticket
whether this does
the job? (Review the ticket too, naturally).
--
You received this message beca
On Saturday, November 18, 2017 at 8:42:48 PM UTC, Michael Frey wrote:
>
> This is still broken ins Sage 8.1.rc2 with the same error. Should I post
> a new thread?
>
please try the branch on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24085
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
8.1 will have gcc 7.2.0.
> On 19/11/2017, at 11:15, foolish...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Based on the error message and a bit of a search, I think it may be related
> to https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=249731, which
> states:
> "Use ucontext_t not struct ucontext in linux-unwi
Why is sage trying to build gcc-5.4.0 when you have 7.2.1? Are you missing
gfortran?
Building an older version of gcc with a newer one like this usually leads to
trouble.
François
> On 19/11/2017, at 08:23, foolish...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
> Hello All:
>
> I have a fairly new laptop and am us
This is still broken ins Sage 8.1.rc2 with the same error. Should I post a
new thread?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goo
On 16/11/2017 11:32, Erik Bray wrote:
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, David Loeffler
wrote:
I'd like to request opinions on whether we should get rid of the "Trusted
Authors" check in the Sage patchbot.
At present, the patchbot won't test a ticket unless all of the names in the
Trac "Authors
Thank you, Jeroen. This will be corrected.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Le samedi 18 novembre 2017 09:54:01 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> On 2017-11-18 09:22, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > You *should* be able to move the sage-x.y.z/ directory anywhere you
> > want. If you copy the s
On 2017-11-18 09:22, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
You *should* be able to move the sage-x.y.z/ directory anywhere you
want. If you copy the sage script or make a symbolic link to it, you
should modify the script to reflect this (as instructed at the top of
the script). It is best i
I sem to remember that the Sage tree can (or, at least, should) no longer
be moved after building.
However, we still document the relocation of this tree in the README.md
fike :
You *should* be able to move the sage-x.y.z/ directory anywhere you
want. If you copy the sage script or make a sym
14 matches
Mail list logo
