The immediate reason is that maxima returns:
Principal Value
(%o4) 2
and Sage since #7377 (7 years ago) catches "Principal Value" and makes it
divergent.
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/7377 for reasons this was introduced.
There are tickets that urge to fix
After adding one more depencency (hevea) the compilation succeeds. Thank
you for your help.
It needs quite some dependencies that are not mentioned on the README's
instructions though (like hevea and texlive). Are those just undocumented
or does it depend on some build options?
--
You receive
Well richcmp allows you to define just one method. But it does not save you
any work at all if the order is partial.
Because then you have to distinguish the cases op = op_LE , op_GE, op_LT
... etc. so all that you save is documentation and everything is more
obscure.
I also tried the ric
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:25:07PM +0200, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> Error downloading rst2ipynb-0.2.2.tar.gz
Context?
Not directly related, but for information I released yesterday
rst2ipynb 0.2.3, which includes Jeroen's patches and improved handling
of Python's code blocks, courtesy of Jason K
On Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 2:17:10 PM UTC-7, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> the 1-click openssl install image for OSX is called Xcode, and one can go
> for a long lunch while waiting for it to finish, even on a fast network...
>
> Apple should pick up the bill for these lunches, and much more,
Thanks everyone for the discussion.
I opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24071 to improve the
docstring of reduce().
It's ready for review, let's continue the discussion there.
> In Singular's implementation p' does not depend on the order of the
> polynomials in I because it starts with so
the 1-click openssl install image for OSX is called Xcode, and one can go for a
long lunch while waiting for it to finish, even on a fast network...
Apple should pick up the bill for these lunches, and much more, I fully agree.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goog
> On 20/10/2017, at 09:58, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> So do you think that sed command actually fixed the first error?
Yes, I think your second error was way after compiling the file giving
you the first error.
François
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Okay, I've added automake-1.11 and a full texlive install to the deps. I'll
rerun the build and see how it turns out.
So do you think that sed command actually fixed the first error?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:07:19PM +0200, Luca De Feo wrote:
> |X| Yes, we should fully support OpenSSL now, and clarify the
> licensing issue.
>
> > the way our
> > "package manager" works allows to install an optional package without
> > having to rely on openssl (no https), we only rel
> On 20/10/2017, at 09:43, François Bissey wrote:
>
> textile
texlive - thank you autocorrect.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsu
> On 20/10/2017, at 09:36, Timo Kaufmann wrote:
>
> With that change the build still fails, just for a different reason:
>
> ```
> Making install in doc
> make[1]: Entering directory
> '/home/timo/nix/shell/sage-8.0/local/var/tmp/sage/build/giac-1.2.3.47.p0/src/doc'
> Making install in en
> m
With that change the build still fails, just for a different reason:
```
Making install in doc
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/timo/nix/shell/sage-8.0/local/var/tmp/sage/build/giac-1.2.3.47.p0/src/doc'
Making install in en
make[2]: Entering directory
'/home/timo/nix/shell/sage-8.0/local/var/t
Error downloading rst2ipynb-0.2.2.tar.gz
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email
No, the build started
from https://github.com/sagemath/sage/archive/8.0.tar.gz
The weird looking path names are normal in nixos[1], since it writes every
package under a path containing the hash of its build inputs.
[1]: https://nixos.org/
Am Donnerstag, 19. Oktober 2017 15:18:56 UTC-5 schrieb
Thanks for taking a look at it. Yes, the spkg-install is modified:
```
--- old/build/pkgs/giac/spkg-install 2017-07-21 14:10:00.0 -0500
+++ new/build/pkgs/giac/spkg-install 2017-10-15 15:55:55.321237645 -0500
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
## Giac
###
+find . -
have you by any chance started from a binary Sage install rather than from the
source (these weird looking path names in the log suggest this)?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai
It looks to me like your spkg-install for giac has custom modifications. From
the log
Host system:
Linux pad 4.9.56 #1-NixOS SMP Thu Oct 12 19:24:22 UTC 2017 x86_64 GNU/Linux
C compiler: gcc
C
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 08:50:01PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > Doesn't work for me (Firefox 45 on Linux). I see the Activate button and the
> > code examples change but nothing becomes interactive.
Forgot to mention: if you open the javascript console (shift-ctrl-K on
Firefox/linux), you c
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:07:00PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Doesn't work for me (Firefox 45 on Linux). I see the Activate button and the
> code examples change but nothing becomes interactive.
Hmm, presumably beta.mybinder.org being slow at certain times of the
day. Which is saying that we s
|X| Yes, we should fully support OpenSSL now, and clarify the
licensing issue.
> the way our
> "package manager" works allows to install an optional package without
> having to rely on openssl (no https), we only rely on the computation of
> sha1
There you go for something crippled! https://
Hans added that one should not rely on the behaviour that Singular reorders
the list. This may change in a future version of Singular. He mentioned it
only to explain the behaviour that is currently observed.
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 11:20:05 UTC+2, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> According to Hans Sch
As it is well known the integral of 1/(cos(theta)^2) is tan(theta)
But there seems to be a problem evaluating the definite integral:
var("theta", domain="real")
> (1/cos(theta)^2).integral(theta, -pi/4 , pi/4 , algorithm='sympy')#
> Works
> (1/cos(theta)^2).integral(theta, -pi/4 , pi/4 , al
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:19 AM Emmanuel Charpentier <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Erik
>
> Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017 09:19:00 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit :
>
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Jeroen Demeyer
>> wrote:
>> > On 2017-10-18 19:02, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>> >>
>> >
Le mercredi 18 octobre 2017 20:36:47 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> On 2017-10-18 19:02, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > This option commits us to maintain (unnecessary and dangerous, IMHO)
> > Sage-specifc SSL patches at least in R, Python and pip
>
> Really? Which Sage-specific SSL patc
Dear Erik
Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017 09:19:00 UTC+2, Erik Bray a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Jeroen Demeyer > wrote:
> > On 2017-10-18 19:02, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> >>
> >> This option commits us to maintain (unnecessary and dangerous, IMHO)
> >> Sage-specifc SSL patches
OK. Unless you correct me, I'll tally your vote as :
|X| No, we should wait until OpenSSL finishes fixing their license
situation formally.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Le jeudi 19 octobre 2017 09:26:46 UTC+2, Ralf Stephan a écrit :
>
> After the previous comments I'd like to change my vote from Yes
Dear Jeroen,
Unless you correct me, I'll tally your vote as
|X| No, we should wait until OpenSSL finishes fixing their license
situation formally.
--
Emmanuel Charpentier
Le mercredi 18 octobre 2017 11:10:38 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> First of all, I think that your email is unfair be
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 3:49 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> > For what it is worth, I strongly agree with everything you write above.
>> > +1
>>
>> Also +1 with some quibbles about section (agree with in
>> principle, but in tone or nuance).
>>
>
> perhaps didn't they find the openssl one-click instal
> > For what it is worth, I strongly agree with everything you write above.
> +1
>
> Also +1 with some quibbles about section (agree with in
> principle, but in tone or nuance).
>
>
perhaps didn't they find the openssl one-click installer
right in the middle of the screen yet.
That sound
Thanks. It seems back again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-dev
Hi,
trac.sagemath.org can be pinged but refuses to connect.
Any help?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dima Pasechnik
Date: Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:53 PM
Subject: [sagemath-admins] trac down?
To: sagemath-admins
I cannot get to https://trac.sagemath.org - or any tickets I tried.
The git server still work, and I can ssh to the host, too.
Reboot?
Than
According to Hans Schoenemann:
"Usually (i.e. in a ring with a well ordering and no additional flags)
reduce/kNF (p,I) computes p' (with p a polynomial and I a list of
polynomials)
with p-p' is in the ideal generated by I and no monomial of p' is
divisible by any L(f) for f in I.
If I is a standa
After the previous comments I'd like to change my vote from Yes to
|X| No
Regards,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@google
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2017-10-18 19:02, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
>>
>> This option commits us to maintain (unnecessary and dangerous, IMHO)
>> Sage-specifc SSL patches at least in R, Python and pip
>
>
> Really? Which Sage-specific SSL patches does this req
36 matches
Mail list logo
