> On 10/09/2017, at 18:16, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I just want to share the little pleasure that sage managed to add 2+2 in
> python3.
>
> Here is a sample session in ipython3
>
> In [1]: import sage.all
> In [2]: from sage.combinat.q_bernoulli import *
> In [3]: a
How to try to reproduce this:
- create a fresh new clone of the git repo
- switch to the branch public/python3-experiment-v2
- upload cypari1.1.1 in upstream/
- export SAGE_PYTHON3=yes
- make build
- ./sage -sh
- ipython3
and then the commands given above. No guarantee at all !
Frédéric
Le dima
Hey Martin,
I am also getting similar timings, but actually testing Permutations(7)
both times. :P What is more interesting is %prun:
sage: %prun L = [pi.binary_search_tree() for pi in Permutations(7)]
3430302 function calls (2949342 primitive calls) in 3.526 seconds
Ordered by: i
Hello everybody,
I just want to share the little pleasure that sage managed to add 2+2 in
python3.
Here is a sample session in ipython3
In [1]: import sage.all
In [2]: from sage.combinat.q_bernoulli import *
In [3]: a=ZZ(2)
In [4]: b=ZZ(691)
In [5]: a+b
Out[5]: 693
In [6]: a-b
Out[6]: -689
In
Great idea, I especially like:
* python 3
* sage infrastructure
* sage packaging
I plan to work on https://github.com/sagemath/sage_sample quite a bit. For
which I hope that it falls under sage packaging ;)
For python 3 it would be good to make some more documentation on how to get on
the pyth
It is a server with 8 cores and 32GB of RAM, but with several other sagenb
processes and twenty users on jupyterhub plus 60 on the sagenb instances
cause no performance issue (usually)
El sábado, 9 de septiembre de 2017, 15:03:53 (UTC+2), kcrisman escribió:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, September 9, 2017
Hi Ralf,
Yes but considering you are on sage-devel I thought there might be a
reasonable chance that you would run into this issue sooner or later
(especially if you set pythonpath in your bashrc). I just wanted to shamelessly
advertise that trac ticket to potentially interested people.
The
Dear all,
I'm having a performance problem, and I believe I have successfully located
it in the initialization code of LabelledBinaryTrees. Part of my code is
simply computing the binary tree corresponding to a permutation. I have
the following timing:
sage: timeit("[pi.binary_search_tree()
On 09/09/2017 05:05 PM, Maarten Derickx wrote:
> In case people start setting pythonpath after reading this thread:
> you will actually get some silly doctest failures if python path is
> set.
I don't need to set SAGE_PATH (or PYTHONPATH) for testing Sage. All I
want is to tell Sage about a locall
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Maarten Derickx <
m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your input David. We discussed it on trac, and decided to leave
> the situation as is on python 2.7 because it is stable enough as is given
> the pynormaliz fix.
>
> For python 3 we propese to fix t
Thanks for your input David. We discussed it on trac, and decided to leave the
situation as is on python 2.7 because it is stable enough as is given the
pynormaliz fix.
For python 3 we propese to fix the sorting in upstream ipython. Using str based
sort only if the standard sorting raises an er
In case people start setting pythonpath after reading this thread: you will
actually get some silly doctest failures if python path is set.
I have made a ticket for this which fixes these doctest:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23613
It is a very Small change and it currently needs review. T
On Saturday, September 9, 2017 at 6:12:49 AM UTC-4, Enrique Artal wrote:
>
> It is quite useful, indeed. We have installed it in our servers.
>
Could it be made "even easier" to deploy? Sagenb really just required
someone who knew how to give things a domain name and commands to start a
serve
It is quite useful, indeed. We have installed it in our servers.
El viernes, 8 de septiembre de 2017, 16:48:49 (UTC+2), kcrisman escribió:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 7, 2017 at 11:16:14 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> did you see this:
>> https://benjamin-hackl.at/2016/01/16/jupyterhub-w
Hi everyone,
I'd like to organize some online Sage Days, where people gather on
zulip.sagemath.org and work on Sage together. The two things to be decided
are
1. What topics should we focus on?
2. What days/times work for the most people?
Some of these may transition into in-person working groups
15 matches
Mail list logo
