Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 2 September 2017 at 21:59, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I don't know if Sage works on Solaris right now, but if it does, does it > build gcc (as it does on OS X), or does it use a preexisting compiler? > I would be surprised if Sage did build on Solaris now, as I would be extreamly surprised if

[sage-devel] Re: Some polynomial timings

2017-09-02 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
Hey Simon, > From Ulrich's timings, it seems like we are still loosing quite a lot in > > converting to/from singular. > > Is it really the *conversion*? I wouldn't be surprised if that example > would take a long time in Singular without a conversion. It does take some time, but far less tha

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread John H Palmieri
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 11:54:00 AM UTC-7, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > On 2 September 2017 at 01:41, John H Palmieri > wrote: > >> >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that >> recent information? It is possible

Re: [sage-devel] Does anyone use SAGE64?

2017-09-02 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
On 2 September 2017 at 01:41, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > Can you clarify? You say that the are necessary on Solaris, but is that > recent information? It is possible that newer versions of Sage and/or > Solaris might make SAGE64 unnecessary. > > Regards, > John > Hi John, https

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] For info ?

2017-09-02 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On 2 September 2017 at 18:12, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > More precisely, the sagemath package is available on zesty (17.04) > > https://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/sagemath > > I also don't see the point of keeping the ppa updated. It would be more > confusing tha

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] For info ?

2017-09-02 Thread Vincent Delecroix
More precisely, the sagemath package is available on zesty (17.04) https://packages.ubuntu.com/zesty/sagemath I also don't see the point of keeping the ppa updated. It would be more confusing than helpful. One thing that needs to be done is to update the documentation on the SageMath websi

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] For info ?

2017-09-02 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi Since sage is now in debian, the PPA is unlikely to be updated often, if at all. On a new ubuntu, sage is inherited from Debian. If someone is interested in maintaining that feel free to contact me off-list. Regards, Jan On 2 September 2017 at 17:17, HG wrote: > I would like to know when sa

[sage-devel] Re: Some polynomial timings

2017-09-02 Thread parisse
FYI, this test takes a few seconds with the following giac script (6.2s on my Mac with 1 thread): threads:=1; n:=30; f := symb2poly((1 + x + y + z+t)^n,[x,y,z,t]):; time(p:=f*(f+1)); -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe

[sage-devel] Re: lib*.so conflict

2017-09-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 9:10:51 AM UTC+1, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > I used to have the exact same problem (with libtinfo*) back when Sage > shipped ncurses 5 (to which libtinfo* belong). My workaround was to move > libtinfo* out of the way : Sage the used the systemwide libtinf

[sage-devel] Re: lib*.so conflict

2017-09-02 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
I used to have the exact same problem (with libtinfo*) back when Sage shipped ncurses 5 (to which libtinfo* belong). My workaround was to move libtinfo* out of the way : Sage the used the systemwide libtinfo*. A recent upgrade to the Sage-shipped ncurses (which is now version 6) fixed this. IM