On Sat, 19 Aug 2017, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
It would be nice to have the most relevant ones first and not just
alphabetical.
Define "relevant."
Well, instead of "relevant" we could define "basic"- or "beginner"-index
for a function, say an integer from 1 to 100. 1-10 would mean something
> Compared to Sage 8.0, matrices in Sage 8.1.beta1 now have a host of new
> methods:
>
> - leading_coefficient
> - leading_item
> - leading_monomial
> - leading_support
> - leading_term
>
> These are inherited from the category of finite dimensional modules with
> basis of which
Define "relevant." Some do not work because of old code that needs to be
lifted up to the appropriate category code. However, what might be less
useful for you might be useful for someone else. In my mind, alphabetical
is the best way to go because it makes it the easiest to find things.
Best,
Hello All,
Seems like the `fractional_chromatic_index` method for graphs contains a
bug.
The implementation contains an infinite loop that is broken when a quantity
is less than or equal to 1, however the loop never ends on the following
input:
sage: g=graphs.PetersenGraph()
sage: g.fractiona
As e.g. SymPy has the same problem one might look if it already was
addressed in other software using IPython.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sag
