> On 3/06/2017, at 18:04, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 10:48:19 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
> Only used by sage. Those are the components linked to it
>
> Naive questions (maybe irrelevant): Shouldn't it be only libs/pynac
> that is linked to libpynac? Are the direct links
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 10:48:19 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> Only used by sage. Those are the components linked to it
Naive questions (maybe irrelevant): Shouldn't it be only libs/pynac
that is linked to libpynac? Are the direct links from other Sage modules
really necessary? Should they b
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 2:33:12 PM UTC+2, Stan wrote:
>
> Does anyone know why this is and how this could be accelerated?
>
It could be accelerated by caching the assumptions and only send
them to Maxima before integration/solve/simplification requests.
Other usage of assumptions/domains is by
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 8:29:05 PM UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
>
> Please, if you are a member of sagemath group on github, do merge the pull
> requests #5 and #11 (easy ones) for sagetex
>
> https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/pull/11
> https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/pull/5
>
done.
> On 3/06/2017, at 05:28, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 2:54:22 AM UTC-6, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> No. See
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44322187/binary-using-both-python-c-api-version-2-and-3
>
> But then we need to either build libraries libpynac2 and libpynac3 or put
There seems to be a bug in the sparse6 string generator.
sage: G=graphs.EllinghamHorton78Graph()
sage: G.sparse6_string()
':~?@M_GEA_w?C`WGEaOOGaWWI_OmGBGKL`w}OcXINCxQGCPUWCp]WdPeOEh[Zc`q^Fh}_gXwagyAfGaYfhAa^IYEgIyqlji}ojREqfa{rlbCtljKvjbatMYWv_Jq|hBy{hSAdn{M
*\\*OCRAeRtEa_wVlSHBhagjkBgzpCY}OSr'
Please, if you are a member of sagemath group on github, do merge the pull
requests #5 and #11 (easy ones) for sagetex
https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/pull/11
https://github.com/sagemath/sagetex/pull/5
Frederic
Le mercredi 31 mai 2017 21:52:16 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> Hi Dan,
>
>
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 2:54:22 AM UTC-6, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> No. See
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44322187/binary-using-both-python-c-api-version-2-and-3
>
> But then we need to either build libraries libpynac2 and libpynac3 or put
libpynac somewhere in local/lib/python*. Do we k
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 6:33:12 AM UTC-6, Stan wrote:
>
> I asked this question before on ask.sagemath (
> https://ask.sagemath.org/question/37744/why-is-assume-so-slow/) but
> haven't found an answer yet, so perhaps someone here has an idea.
>
> Basically, declaring assumptions using `assume
I asked this question before on ask.sagemath
(https://ask.sagemath.org/question/37744/why-is-assume-so-slow/) but
haven't found an answer yet, so perhaps someone here has an idea.
Basically, declaring assumptions using `assume()` or within `var('x',
domain='real') takes an awful lot of time, e
> On 1/06/2017, at 23:27, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
> I also thought about building both py2+3 at the same time, it would be a
> great debugging help during the transition if you can easily run both. Then
> in 3 years we'll just cut out the py2 part and be done with it...
>
> I am thinking of what
one way or the other, underlinking does not work on Cygwin.
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 9:54:22 AM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> No. See
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44322187/binary-using-both-python-c-api-version-2-and-3
>
> On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 8:35:57 AM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
> On 2/06/2017, at 20:54, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> No. See
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44322187/binary-using-both-python-c-api-version-2-and-3
So much for that then.
This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the University of Canter
No.
See
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44322187/binary-using-both-python-c-api-version-2-and-3
On Friday, June 2, 2017 at 8:35:57 AM UTC+2, François wrote:
>
>
> > On 2/06/2017, at 17:57, Ralf Stephan >
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 12:29:23 PM UTC+2, François wrote:
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
