On 2017-01-18, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> ticket upgrading Maxima tp 5.39.0 is ready for review
> now: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18920
I'm pleased to say that Maxima 5.40.0 has been released. As usual there
will be a process of making packages and minor fixes until it seems to
stabilize.
I got Dima's invitation and transferred the repository. Enjoy!
On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 at 10:23:06 PM UTC-5, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Frédéric Chapoton wrote me asking if I could transfer the sagetex github
> repo to the sagemath group. I can do that, but github requires me to have
> the
I have a proposal for making the transition to use Sage with Python 3. See
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23119 for details (and a branch which
works, at least in my limited testing). The proposal:
- Have a new command "sage3" which runs Sage using Python 3.
- If you build Sage with the envir
Hi Dan,
"You've invited Dan Drake to Sage Mathematical Software System! They'll be
receiving an email shortly. They can also visit https://github.com/sagemath to
accept the invitation."
this way we can do the repo transfer.
Thanks,
Dima
PS. Your mail bounces, so I post here just in case.
On
Dima -- you're promoted to an owner. Please do useful stuff. Thanks!!
https://github.com/orgs/sagemath/people
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> perhaps you can add me to this group and remove Keshav, who is not
> contributing since the past 3 or more years.
>
> --
> Yo
perhaps you can add me to this group and remove Keshav, who is not contributing
since the past 3 or more years.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sa
Martin Albrecht reviewed the code
(https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22986#comment:5) and asked whether the
SBox class should be available in the global namespace.
I don't have a opinion here, so I can just remove that import, or does
someone think it should be available?
Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:33 AM UTC-4, William wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Frédéric Chapoton
>> wrote:
>> > The correct Dan Drake is the owner of
>> >
>> > https://github.com/dandrake/sagetex
>>
>> As far as I can
Hi,
A lot of issues here, but can I suggest maybe you take a look at
using the Guix functional package manager as a way of keeping track of your
dependency tree and for example using different versions of python
concurrently etc. It just might be a great help in development with a lot
o
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 11:49:33 AM UTC-4, William wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Frédéric Chapoton
> > wrote:
> > The correct Dan Drake is the owner of
> >
> > https://github.com/dandrake/sagetex
>
> As far as I can tell, that information doesn't help... which is
> defi
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:35 PM, Frédéric Chapoton
wrote:
> The correct Dan Drake is the owner of
>
> https://github.com/dandrake/sagetex
As far as I can tell, that information doesn't help... which is
definitely a shortcoming of Github. In any case, I (or whoever adds
dan) awaits confirmation
Without switching to clang, this will require the dependencies especially
the C++ dependencies to be rebuilt with gcc. So, you'll need to make sure
the C++ library built with gcc is not selected by sage packages and only
the sage built library by using that library. For eg. assume you use gmp
from
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:00 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> I don't think this proposal would affect things too drastically, but just
> remember that ideally a Mac (not just Linux) user can just download source
> (or use git to do so), type make, wait a while, and still have a usable
> sage-the-distributio
13 matches
Mail list logo
