On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 6:04:15 PM UTC+2, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
>
> There are immediate plans to implement embedded number fields and qqbar in
> Flint/Antic (https://github.com/wbhart/antic). In fact, there will be a
> workshop and coding sprint in Kaiserslautern, 31 July - 4 August partial
Another system that takes the Sage-like "distribution" approach, and is
worthwhile to have a look to see how they package things, is Macaulay2.
However, they have a serious technical reason for such an approach, as they
need compatibility with Boehm GC, and many libraries they need typically ha
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
[...]
> The extent and scope to which Sage "vendors" its dependencies, in the
> form of what some call "sage-the-distribution", is *not* particularly
> normal in the open source world. Vendoring *some* dependencies is not
> unusual, but Sage does
On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 3:20:00 PM UTC+2, Ralf Stephan wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library. My question:
> is there a stand-alone open-source fast version of such a package?
> Reason I'm asking is linkage with Pynac.
>
> Regards,
>
There are immediate plans
On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 7:52:57 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> If you build Sage's IPython package with SAGE_PYTHON3=yes, then it will
> install a script local/bin/ipython3. (Note then that if the sage-location
> script runs, its function make_scripts_relative will break
> local/bin/ipy
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 6:11:02 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 5:07:22 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>>
>>> incidentally, it would be nice if we could equiv local/bin/ipython with
I wonder if the recent discussion of possible schemes about how to build
Sage for python 2 and 3 (one may propose (or object to) that Sage should be
built to be runnable both for python2 and python3) could be related with
your proposal.
Is it simply orthogonal with your proposal or somehow cou
On 26 May 2017 at 14:19, Ralf Stephan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library. My question:
> is there a stand-alone open-source fast version of such a package?
> Reason I'm asking is linkage with Pynac.
As far as I know the only other software offering a similar
f
Hello,
The qqbar source does not use a lower-level library. My question:
is there a stand-alone open-source fast version of such a package?
Reason I'm asking is linkage with Pynac.
Regards,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsu
Hi folks interested in Sage packaging,
Almost every time the topic comes up, I complain that it isn't easier
to use more system packages as both build- and run-time dependencies
of Sage. I'd like to make some progress on actually doing something
about that, and I have some ideas, but I'd like to
I think it is a good idea to have highlights in the release notes,
otherwise we may give the impression that all we do is fix bugs
(sometimes). There must be many Sage users who do not bother to
upgrade every time, possibly basing that decision on whether anything
interestng strikes them in the r
>
> Perhaps it would be possible to have, in addition to the compulsory AUTHOR
> and REVIEWER fields, in sage-trac a new optional field HIGHLIGHTS, that
> the
> author can fill with some text if (s)he believes the ticket is worth it
>
The text should be refined, unlike the others that we usua
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Simon King wrote:
This was done in ~10 bigger ticket and another ~10 with small
modifications. As an example see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21861
Hence the ticket system would be wrong place for this. For something like
this we should have a wiki page.
How do you co
Hi Jori,
On 2017-05-26, Jori =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E4ntysalo?= wrote:
> This was done in ~10 bigger ticket and another ~10 with small
> modifications. As an example see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21861
>
> Hence the ticket system would be wrong place for this. For something like
> this we shou
Hi!
On 2017-05-26, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> To continue the heritage, the authors should be supported and encouraged by
> the system to make writing a short note for highlights not a burden but a
> voluntary work motivated by desires to show off his or her work.
Perhaps it would be possible to hav
pip upgrade is waiting at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21835 (but may
not be ready)
I am working on a ticket for changes concerning ETuple and map.
Le vendredi 26 mai 2017 09:34:57 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
>
>
> On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 2:11:02 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 9:11 AM, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>> As an example, I could put something like this for 8.0:
>>
>> - Finite lattices now have function to compute congruence, and
>> several
>> congruence-related functions like quoti
Maybe you could make some of your changes into tickets and branches, Nils ?
I am thinking in particular about the changes relates to div, idiv, that
could go into
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22875
Unicode is certainly going to be subtle to handle. Some step is being made
in https://trac.
> On 26/05/2017, at 15:28, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 6:40:18 PM UTC-7, François wrote:
> I am a bit surprised you can do that. I have just sent a PR to pynac
> a couple of days ago to have it build with python3.
> https://github.com/pynac/pynac/pull/248
> I have a fee
On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 2:11:02 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 5:07:22 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 4:40:01 PM UTC-7, Nils Bruin wrote:
>>>
>>> incidentally, it would be nice if we could equiv local/bin/ipython with
>>
On Fri, 26 May 2017, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
As an example, I could put something like this for 8.0:
- Finite lattices now have function to compute congruence, and several
congruence-related functions like quotient lattice, lattice of congruences
and checks if a lattice is re
On Friday, May 26, 2017 at 7:10:43 AM UTC+2, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> How many developer does something to highlight **in a particular
> release**?
>
I don't know. But who knows before we ask developers?
> As an example, I could put something like this for 8.0:
>
> - Finite lattices now
22 matches
Mail list logo
