[sage-devel] please test new sagenb on #23066

2017-05-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/23066 Please test and report there. it is identical to the pre-release from about a week ago, except version number and Changes file. Dima -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-devel] Re: Sage and Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2017

2017-05-23 Thread Dominique Laurain
Web page : http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/developer/git_setup.html at the end of chapter "Installing git" "Chapter 2 of the git book" is a link to https://book.git-scm.com/2_installing_git.html ...but not existing : 404 Dominique -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Poll for issue G1 a specific guideline for writing docstrings

2017-05-23 Thread Daniel Krenn
On 2017-05-23 04:16, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > For how to typeset True/False/None/... when we need to spell them out > explicitly, as already suggested, I would be in favor of :obj:`True`. I wasn't aware that this works. But in this case, I am in favor (+1) of :obj:`True` as well. Best Daniel

[sage-devel] Report on the results of the polls for specific guidelines for docstrings

2017-05-23 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Dear developers, Thank you for your participation for the polls (and discussions) on guidelines for docstrings. Now I close the polls and summarize the result: H1, H3, H4, H6 got affirmative votes from most of you. H2 did not get affirmative votes from most of you as it is stated in the thread