Le mardi 18 avril 2017 21:25:44 UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>
>
> I just managed (using tricks to avoid a few remaining issues in
> cythonization and packages) to get make succeed in building sage with
> SAGE_PYTHON3=yes
>
Congratulations!!!
This is already an impressive achievement!
>
Dear all,
I just managed (using tricks to avoid a few remaining issues in
cythonization and packages) to get make succeed in building sage with
SAGE_PYTHON3=yes
Sadly, but not unexpectedly, sage then crashes at startup. Apparently, it
cannot not find/import any cython extension..
Frédéric
Her
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 05:48:30PM +1200, François Bissey wrote:
> I am starting this debate because of discussion I had earlier
> in #22670. It was pointed out to me that there was no policy
> of avoiding `sage.misc.package` and I would very much want one.
>From following the many discussions on
